Microscopic fractional anisotropy outperforms multiple sclerosis lesion assessment and clinical outcome associations over standard fractional anisotropy tensor

F. Vivó,E. Solana,A. Calvi,E. Lopez‐Soley,L. B. Reid,S. Pascual‐Diaz,C. Garrido,L. Planas‐Tardido,J. M. Cabrera‐Maqueda,S. Alba‐Arbalat,M. Sepulveda,Y. Blanco,B. Kanber,F. Prados,A. Saiz,S. Llufriu,E. Martinez‐Heras
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26706
IF: 4.8
2024-06-15
Human Brain Mapping
Abstract:This research reveals that microscopic fractional anisotropy outperforms standard fractional anisotropy in identifying tissue damage and discerning connectivity patterns in multiple sclerosis, thus improving lesion prediction and insight into the disease's cognitive and physical effects. We aimed to compare the ability of diffusion tensor imaging and multi‐compartment spherical mean technique to detect focal tissue damage and in distinguishing between different connectivity patterns associated with varying clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Seventy‐six people diagnosed with MS were scanned using a SIEMENS Prisma Fit 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), employing both conventional (T1w and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery) and advanced diffusion MRI sequences from which fractional anisotropy (FA) and microscopic FA (μFA) maps were generated. Using automated fiber quantification (AFQ), we assessed diffusion profiles across multiple white matter (WM) pathways to measure the sensitivity of anisotropy diffusion metrics in detecting localized tissue damage. In parallel, we analyzed structural brain connectivity in a specific patient cohort to fully grasp its relationships with cognitive and physical clinical outcomes. This evaluation comprehensively considered different patient categories, including cognitively preserved (CP), mild cognitive deficits (MCD), and cognitively impaired (CI) for cognitive assessment, as well as groups distinguished by physical impact: those with mild disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 3). In our initial objective, we employed Ridge regression to forecast the presence of focal MS lesions, comparing the performance of μFA and FA. μFA exhibited a stronger association with tissue damage and a higher predictive precision for focal MS lesions across the tracts, achieving an R‐squared value of .57, significantly outperforming the R‐squared value of .24 for FA (p‐value
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,neurosciences,neuroimaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?