A.B. Balantekin,H.R. Band,C.D. Bass,D.E. Bergeron,D. Berish,N.S. Bowden,J.P. Brodsky,C.D. Bryan,T. Classen,A.J. Conant,G. Deichert,M.V. Diwan,M.J. Dolinski,A. Erickson,B.T. Foust,J.K. Gaison,A. Galindo-Uribarri,C.E. Gilbert,B.T. Hackett S. Hans,A.B. Hansell,K.M. Heeger,B. Heffron D.E. Jaffe,X. Ji,D.C. Jones,O. Kyzylova,C.E. Lane,T.J. Langford,J. LaRosa,B.R. Littlejohn,X. Lu,J. Maricic,M.P. Mendenhall,R. Milincic,I. Mitchell,P.E. Mueller,H.P. Mumm,J. Napolitano,R. Neilson,J.A. Nikkel,D. Norcini,S. Nour,J.L. Palomino-Gallo,D.A. Pushin,X. Qian,E. Romero-Romero,R. Rosero,P.T. Surukuchi,M.A. Tyra,R.L. Varner,C. White,J. Wilhelmi,A. Woolverton,M. Yeh,A. Zhang,C. Zhang,X. Zhang

Abstract:Reactor neutrino experiments have seen major improvements in precision in recent years. With the experimental uncertainties becoming lower than those from theory, carefully considering all sources of $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ is important when making theoretical predictions. One source of $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ that is often neglected arises from the irradiation of the nonfuel materials in reactors. The $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ rates and energies from these sources vary widely based on the reactor type, configuration, and sampling stage during the reactor cycle and have to be carefully considered for each experiment independently. In this article, we present a formalism for selecting the possible $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ sources arising from the neutron captures on reactor and target materials. We apply this formalism to the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ source for the the Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum Measurement (PROSPECT) experiment. Overall, we observe that the nonfuel $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ contributions from HFIR to PROSPECT amount to 1\% above the inverse beta decay threshold with a maximum contribution of 9\% in the 1.8--2.0~MeV range. Nonfuel contributions can be particularly high for research reactors like HFIR because of the choice of structural and reflector material in addition to the intentional irradiation of target material for isotope production. We show that typical commercial pressurized water reactors fueled with low-enriched uranium will have significantly smaller nonfuel $\overline{\nu}_{e}$ contribution.

Sensitivity and Discovery Potential of the PROSPECT Experiment

Development of PROSPECT detectors for precision antineutrino studies

A Search for Sterile Neutrinos with PROSPECT

The PROSPECT Reactor Antineutrino Experiment

Improved Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Search and Energy Spectrum Measurement with the PROSPECT Experiment at HFIR

The PROSPECT physics program

First Search for Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillations at HFIR with PROSPECT

Final Measurement of the U235 Antineutrino Energy Spectrum with the PROSPECT-I Detector at HFIR

Final Search for Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillations with the PROSPECT-I Detector at HFIR

Reactor Antineutrino Directionality Measurement with the PROSPECT-I Detector

Nonfuel Antineutrino Contributions in the High Flux Isotope Reactor

A low mass optical grid for the PROSPECT reactor antineutrino detector

Light Collection and Pulse-Shape Discrimination in Elongated Scintillator Cells for the PROSPECT Reactor Antineutrino Experiment

Experimental Parameters for a Reactor Antineutrino Experiment at Very Short Baselines

Reference worldwide model for antineutrinos from reactors

Precision spectroscopy with reactor anti-neutrinos

Calibration strategy of the PROSPECT-II detector with external and intrinsic sources

Impact of reactor neutrino uncertainties on coherent scattering's discovery potential

Sterile Neutrinos: Reactor Experiments

Lithium-loaded Liquid Scintillator Production for the PROSPECT experiment

Sensitivity of an antineutrino monitor for remote nuclear reactor discovery