Abstract:After decades of decline since 2005, the global prevalence of undernourishment reverted and since 2015 has increased to levels seen in 2010 to 2011. The prevalence is highest in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs), especially Africa and Asia. Food insecurity and associated undernutrition detrimentally affect health and socioeconomic development in the short and long term, for individuals, including children, and societies. Physical and economic access to food is crucial to ensure food security. Community‐level interventions could be important to increase access to food in LMICs. To determine the effects of community‐level interventions that aim to improve access to nutritious food in LMICs, for both the whole community and for disadvantaged or at‐risk individuals or groups within a community, such as infants, children and women; elderly, poor or unemployed people; or minority groups. We searched for relevant studies in 16 electronic databases, including trial registries, from 1980 to September 2019, and updated the searches in six key databases in February 2020. We applied no language or publication status limits. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster randomised controlled trials (cRCTs) and prospective controlled studies (PCS). All population groups, adults and children, living in communities in LMICs exposed to community‐level interventions aiming to improve food access were eligible for inclusion. We excluded studies that only included participants with specific diseases or conditions (e.g. severely malnourished children). Eligible interventions were broadly categorised into those that improved buying power (e.g. create income‐generation opportunities, cash transfer schemes); addressed food prices (e.g. vouchers and subsidies); addressed infrastructure and transport that affected physical access to food outlets; addressed the social environment and provided social support (e.g. social support from family, neighbours or government). Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts, and full texts of potentially eligible records, against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or arbitration by a third author, if necessary. For each included study, two authors independently extracted data and a third author arbitrated disagreements. However, the outcome data were extracted by one author and checked by a biostatistician. We assessed risk of bias for all studies using the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) risk of bias tool for studies with a separate control group. We conducted meta‐analyses if there was a minimum of two studies for interventions within the same category, reporting the same outcome measure and these were sufficiently homogeneous. Where we were able to meta‐analyse, we used the random‐effects model to incorporate any existing heterogeneity. Where we were unable to conduct meta‐analyses, we synthesised using vote counting based on effect direction. We included 59 studies, including 214 to 169,485 participants, and 300 to 124, 644 households, mostly from Africa and Latin America, addressing the following six intervention types (three studies assessed two different types of interventions). Interventions that improved buying power: Unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) (16 cRCTs, two RCTs, three PCSs): we found high‐certainty evidence that UCTs improve food security and make little or no difference to cognitive function and development and low‐certainty evidence that UCTs may increase dietary diversity and may reduce stunting. The evidence was very uncertain about the effects of UCTs on the proportion of household expenditure on food, and on wasting. Regarding adverse outcomes, evidence from one trial indicates that UCTs reduce the proportion of infants who are overweight. Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) (nine cRCTs, five PCSs): we found high‐certainty evidence that CCTs result in little to no difference in the proportion of household expenditure on food and that they slightly improve cognitive function in children; moderate‐certainty evidence that CCTs probably slightly improve dietary diversity and low‐certainty evidence that they may make little to no difference to stunting or wasting. Evidence on adverse outcomes (two PCSs) shows that CCTs make no difference to the proportion of overweight children. Income generation interventions (six cRCTs, 11 PCSs): we found moderate‐certainty evidence that income generation interventions probably make little or no difference to stunting or wasting; and low‐certainty evidence that they may result in little to no difference to food security or that they may improve dietary diversity in children, but not for households. Interventions that addressed food prices: Food vouchers (three cRCTs, one RCT): we found moderate‐certainty evidence that food vouchers probably reduce stunting -Abstract Truncated-

Evidence for Policies and Practices to Address Global Food Insecurity

Advancing Nutrition in the International Food Assistance Agenda: Progress and Future Directions Identified at the 2018 Food Assistance for Nutrition Evidence Summit

Livestock and Sustainable Food Systems: Status, Trends, and Priority Actions

Securing Food from Field to Table: What Can We Do?

Agriculture for Improved Nutrition: The Current Research Landscape

Community-level interventions for improving access to food in low- and middle-income countries.

Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020

Food Systems Interventions for Nutrition: Lessons from 6 Program Evaluations in Africa and South Asia

Systematic review of food insecurity and violence against women and girls: Mixed methods findings from low- and middle-income settings

Priority research questions for the UK food system

Advance Equitable Livelihoods

Conflict's impacts on food systems: Mapping available evidence of interactions

Does urban agriculture contribute to food security, and how might this be achieved?

Agriculture, food, and nutrition interventions that facilitate sustainable food production and impact health: an overview of systematic reviews

Food Security and Nutrition in an Urbanizing World

Implications of food insecurity on global health policy and nursing practice

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Food Insecurity among Older Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

The Importance of a Food Systems Approach to Low and Middle Income Countries and Emerging Economies: A Review of Theories and Its Relevance for Disease Control and Malnutrition

Surveying the Evidence on Sustainable Intensification Strategies for Smallholder Agricultural Systems

Gender inequality, reproductive rights and food insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa – a panel data study

Improving Nutrition Security in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and the Role of Animal-Source Foods