β-delayed multiple-particle emitters minibeam radiation therapy: first dosimetric evaluation with Monte Carlo simulations

Angela Corvino,Tim Schneider,Yolanda Prezado
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1390439
IF: 3.718
2024-04-27
Frontiers in Physics
Abstract:Radiation therapy, one of the most effective methods for cancer treatment, is still limited by the tolerances of normal tissues surrounding the tumor. Innovative techniques like spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) have been shown to increase normal tissue dose resistance. Heavy ions also offer high-dose conformity and increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) when compared to protons and X-rays. The alliance of heavy ions and spatial fractionation of the dose has the potential to further increase the therapeutic index for difficult-to-treat cases today. In particular, the use of β -delayed multiple-particle emitters might further improve treatment response, as it holds the potential to increase high linear energy transfer (LET) decay products in the valleys of SFRT (low-dose regions) at the end of the range. To verify this hypothesis, this study compares β -delayed multiple-particle emitters ( 8 Li, 9 C, 31 Ar) with their respective stable isotopes ( 7 Li, 12 C, 40 Ar) to determine possible benefits of β -delayed multiple-particle emitters minibeam radiation therapy ( β -MBRT). Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the GATE toolkit to assess the dose distributions of each ion. RBE-weighted dose distributions were calculated and used for the aforementioned comparison. No significant differences were found among carbon isotopes. In contrast, 8 Li and 31 Ar exhibited improved RBE-weighted dose distributions with an approximately 12–20% increase in the Bragg-peak-to-entrance dose ratio (BEDR) for both peaks and valleys, which favors tissue sparing. Additionally, 8 Li and 31 Ar exhibited a lower peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in normal tissues and higher PVDR in the tumor than 7 Li and 40 Ar. Biological experiments are needed to conclude whether the differences observed make β -delayed multiple-particle emitters advantageous for MBRT.
physics, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?