The Inspiration of Language Input Hypothesis to Foreign Language Teaching

Z. Cheng

Abstract:The article introduces the theory of Monitor Model for SLA(second language acquisition) produced by S.D.Krashen,and focuses on the language input hypothesis.It also discusses the limit and feature of FLT(foreign language teacing) in class,and puts forward the inspiration of Language Input Hyothesis to FLT.

Education,Linguistics,Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Affective Filter Hypothesis and Their Enlightenment to English Teaching in China

许琴

Abstract:"The Input Hypothesis"and"The Affective Filter Hypothesis"are the most important branches of the"Monitor The ory"declared by the famous American linguist Krashen in 1980s.This thesis is based on Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Affec tive Filter Hypothesis,aiming to provide an applicable guide for foreign language teachers and learners in China.

Psychology,Education,Linguistics
The Input Hypothesis: An Inside Look

Theodore V. Higgs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb01791.x

1985-05-01

Foreign Language Annals

Abstract:ABSTRACT The article briefly summarizes and then discusses Krashen's Input Hypothesis as presented in his Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. The Input Hypothesis is considered both as a psycholinguistic and as a pedagogical model. I suggest that as a psycho‐linguistic model the Input Hypothesis fails to account convincingly for the widely accepted fact of fossilization (arrested L2 acquisition) in an acquisition‐rich environment. As a pedagogical model the Input Hypothesis may not be directly applicable to the reality of the U.S. high school or university foreign language classes, since these are so far removed from the immersion/second language environments on which much of the theory underlying the model is based.

education & educational research,linguistics
An Exploration about Krashen's Input Hypothesis in the Computer Network Environment

Cui Junyuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/japuc.2013010101

2013-01-01

International Journal of Advanced Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

Abstract:Krashen’s second language acquisition theory is the most influential theory in foreign or second language learning. The input hypothesis is an essential hypothesis in his theory. The research and debate on input hypothesis never ends. This paper tries to explore the input hypothesis in the computer network environment. It detects computer and network technology can be applied to further explain the input hypothesis. The computer and internet have the function of assisting acquisition, providing enough comprehensible input and improving production ability. This discovery has further implication on improving the English learning in non-English speaking countries. Computer Assisted Language Learning has new demands on both national education investment and college education management; on both teachers and students.
A Review of Krashen’s Input Theory

Zixu Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/3fnf5786

2024-03-02

Abstract:Stephen Krashen is a famous American language educator. Krashen’s achievement in the area of second language acquisition (SLA) has won him a worldwide reputation and influence. In the 1980s, Krashen first proposed five series of hypotheses, namely, the Acquisition-Learning Distinction, the Natural Order Hypothesis, the Monitor Hypothesis, the Input Hypothesis and the Affective Filter Hypothesis, which later are collectively called the “Input Theory”. For many years, this theory has been recognized as the most comprehensive and significant theory in the area of SLA, but while gaining great recognition, this theory has been accompanied by a lot of controversies since its appearance, causing a lot of research and discussion in the academic circle. By analyzing and collating domestic and foreign literature, this paper studies the five aspects of Krashen’s Input Theory in detail, expounds their respective definitions and academic evaluation, and then points out the controversy they are facing with and the suggestions for improvement. Through the author’s research, the Input Theory has altered the idea of language instruction and offered fresh suggestions for communicative language teaching. However, this theory is supposed to be applied with consideration for the unique characteristics of each user and should be defined more explicitly in order to achieve the finest outcomes and bring more developments to the field of SLA.
Krashen’s Input Hypothesis Revisited: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Siqi Chen,Zihan Hu,Siqi Kang,Aolin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61173/9f62nt19

2024-06-06

Abstract:The input hypothesis is the core part of Krashen’s language acquisition theory and is an important second language acquisition theory. The discussion of Krashen’s input hypothesis is of practical significance to current English teaching. In the application of English teaching, the research on Krashen’s input hypothesis focuses on its advantages, while the research on its disadvantages is rare. In such a context, this paper synthesizes both the advantages and disadvantages of Krashen’s input hypothesis in English teaching. It focuses on exploring the shortcomings to put forward specific suggestions to help English teaching. This paper summarizes the application of Krashen’s input hypothesis in English teaching and describes the concept of Krashen’s input hypothesis in English listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Based on these discussions, this study puts forward some concrete suggestions for English teaching. By adopting the principles of Input theory, teachers can design more effective teaching activities and provide richer language input, thereby facilitating students’ language acquisition.
Two Readers Comment on Stephen Krashen's Input Hypothesis: Testing the Relationsbip of Formal Instruction to the Input Hypothesis

G. Ioup

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586703

1984-06-01

Abstract:Of the many theories put forth to account for the processes of second language acquisition (SLA), few have been subjected to empirical testing. The present study examines the difficulties facing an empirical validation of theoretical claims in SLA. It attempts to determine the reasons for the lack of empirical support for the hypotheses emanating from the various theoretical positions. One of the most interesting accounts of SLA is the Monitor Theory defined by Krashen (1981). It embodies many hypotheses concerning the basic processes of second language acquisition and maintains that grammatical structures learned formally are stored in a separate cognitive system from those acquired through natural exposure. This leads to the postulation of two types of language internalization: language acquisition and language learning. Only the former leads to real communication.

Psychology,Linguistics
Implications of Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Affective Filter Hypothesis in College English Teaching

张妮

Abstract:American linguist Krashen proposed the input hypothesis and affective filter hypothesis which has influenced linguistic world deeply. These two assumptions play an important role in improving learners’ language ability in the process of second language acquisition. Applying two hypothesis theories to college English teaching, teachers’ aim is to establish a new mode of language teaching and improve the efficiency of college English teaching.

Linguistics,Education,Psychology
Krashen Revisited: Case Study of the Role of Input, Motivation and Identity in Second Language Learning

Francis Bailey,Ahmed Kadhum Fahad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.36

2021-06-15

Arab World English Journal

Abstract:Stephen Krashen has a long and enduring legacy in the field of second language acquisition. His “Input Hypothesis” was among the very first attempts to create a coherent theoretical account of second language learning. Krashen argued that learners can acquire language through the process of comprehending it. While elements of his model have been extensively critiqued, this idea has endured and offers teachers a clear mandate to provide learners with abundant opportunities to making meaning of the target language. Utilizing a case study of an English language learner, Krashen’s model is challenged and enriched by considering the role that motivation and identity play in learning. Teachers tapping into an important source of learner motivation, role models drawn from the local community or broader society, can inspire and energize students’ studies and help them visualize a life in which a second language plays a vital role. Building upon Krashen’s idea of the importance of language teachers and programs creating robust reading programs for a sustained engagement with second language print resources, the authors propose to expand his vision and include all manner of multimedia and technologies. However, such a program can only succeed if teachers mediate their learners’ social identities and motivations for sustained second language learning.

English Else
A Study on Using Noticing Hypothesis to Improve Learners’ Language Input in Language Learning

Li Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v6i1.2896

2022-01-20

Journal of Contemporary Educational Research

Abstract:In 1967, more than fifty years ago, Corder introduced the concept of “input” in the second language acquisition (SLA) research field. In 1985, Krashen introduced the concept of “comprehensible input hypothesis.” In 1990, Schmidt introduced the concept of “noticing hypothesis” [1]. Today, “input” is becoming more and more popular in the research on second language acquisition. This paper tries to connect theories about input and noticing hypothesis in hope that the clear definition can be helpful to guide language teaching accordingly.
KRASHEN'S THEORY OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

V. Koceva

Abstract:This paper discusses the Krashen’s theory of second language acquisition. It initially presents the hypotheses on the basis of which Krashen sets the principles of second language acquisition. Each hypothesis is explained in detail in continuation. According to the acquisition-learning hypothesis the essential difference between language acquisition and language learning is the difference between conscious acceptance of knowledge that is, memorizing rules and unconscious language learning. According to Krashen’s opinions, presented in this paper, there is no interaction between intuitive, implicit and unconscious knowledge, i.e. acquisition, and formal, conscious and explicit knowledge, i.e. learning. According to the natural order hypothesis, the human mind has a kind of internal program or plan according to which the acquisition of some language structures occurs in a natural way. This natural order of acquisition occurs independently of learning. Furthermore, the paper presents the monitor hypothesis i.e. it explains how acquisition and learning are used. According to the monitor hypothesis the ability to produce sentences is related to the knowledge of second language acquisition, while conscious acceptance of knowledge occurs later to make some contribution to the accuracy of an utterance. All the terms and conditions needed in order for the monitor to be used successfully are listed below, as well as some types of “monitor” use. This paper also presents the input hypothesis that defines the level of input that provides the ideal conditions for language acquisition to happen. Krashen suggests that language acquisition occurs when learners understand the messages that contain structures that are one step beyond the learner’s current language ability. The input hypothesis defends the perspective that we acquire the language by first seeking the meaning and, then learning the structures. In addition, this paper emphasizes the significance of the receptive skills of language learning i.e. it explains the comprehensible input hypothesis and the simplified input used as a source of comprehensible input. Finally, the paper discusses the affective filter hypothesis that explains why learners that are exposed to large amounts of linguistic comprehensible input do not achieve native-like competence in second language acquisition.

Computer Science,Linguistics
Krashen's Input Hypothesis of L2 and the streaming teaching of listening

Wang Hai

Abstract:Streaming teaching has proved to be an effective solution to students' poor performance in listening teaching of college English. After introducing the researches done on Krashen's acquisition theory , the paper argues that Krashen's Input Hypothesis and Affective Filtration Hypothesis have provided a base or theoretic frame for streaming teaching in listening of college English .The paper then puts forwards several implications of the researches for listening teaching of college English.

Computer Science,Linguistics,Education
The Application of Input-output Hypothesis in English Listening Teaching

Yilin Li,Shiyu Sun,Weiling Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/6/20220263

2023-05-17

Abstract:Listening is the foundation of English learning. Listening teaching is also an important part of English teaching classroom, a proper listening teaching method is considered to play an important role in advancing in listening apprehension. The listening teaching strategies in Chinese schools are still inadequate, lack of interesting and efficient, which makes students less productive. To achieve good teaching effect, we found that language input is essential, but the purpose of learning a language is to output, and sufficient input is beneficial to output, which is only possible when language input is greater than language output. Through the analysis of English teaching research in China and abroad, and based on Krashen's input hypothesis, Swain's output hypothesis, the current situation and problems of listening application teaching in Chinese schools, we suggest that teachers should combine listening training with other language skills to make output and input activities complement and promote each other.

Education,Linguistics
On the Scope, Claims and Implications of Krashen’s Theory

Fatma Abdullah al Saidi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.801184

2024-01-01

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Abstract:Throughout the previous decades many theories have been suggested and applied for second language education. Their implementations have caused many debates among educators and linguists. They have come up with so many theories and approaches based on their perspectives of how languages are best learned. Among these theories are the one offered by Stephen Krashen, the renowned American linguist. This article sheds light on the main claims of the five hypotheses offered by Krashen; it presents some evaluations of whether these hypotheses offer any successful insights that can be incorporated into language teaching of different sittings and ends by concluding that Krashen’s hypotheses provide a comprehensive vision about understanding L2 learning and, therefore, exploiting their elements would be fruitful.
Study on the Significance of the Input Hypothesis to English Teaching

Yanping Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/jeer.v3i2.9002

2023-06-01

Abstract:Linguistics plays an immeasurable role in English teaching, as it helps us understand the essence of English. To be more conducive to English teaching, this article will explore the significance of the input hypothesis in English teaching, To improve the quality of English teaching and help students learn English better.

Education,Linguistics
Krashen's second language acquisition, a theory or hypothesis: An analytical study

P D'souza Flavia,C. H. Padmanabha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.14.3.20897

2024-01-01

i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching

Abstract:Language is crucial for adapting to society, and learning different languages enhances human efficiency. Learning a second language involves acquiring any language in addition to one's native language. Second Language Acquisition (SLA) has two meanings, generally, it describes the process of learning a second language, and more specifically, it refers to the theory of how a second language is acquired or picked up. Second language learning demands considerable effort and practice. Stephen Krashen, a prominent linguist, has conducted extensive research on non- English and bilingual language acquisition. Krashen's theory of second language learning is founded on five major hypotheses, the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, the Natural Order Hypothesis, the Monitor Hypothesis, the Input Hypothesis, and the Affective Filter Hypothesis. Given its broad scope and significant impact on language teaching approaches, Krashen's Second Language Acquisition theory is better described as a theory rather than merely a hypothesis. However, like all scientific theories, it continues to be refined and debated in scholarly circles. This article explores Krashen's theories of Second Language Acquisition and provides justifications for referring to them as theories.
Language Input and Output in SLA Learning

Xia Xiao-cui

Abstract:SLA(second language acquisition),as a new disciplinary,systematically studies the nature and the process of acquiring another language. It mainly dissects the relationship between SLA and many variables, such as native language, language input, language output, individual difference, and sociocultural environment, etc. In the process of second language study, language output and input play a vital role in deciding learners' ultimate proficiency in comprehending and employing the target language. Appropriate language input can activate the innate LAD(language acquisition device) of human being, while language output is able to demonstrate the activities of human psychological cognition, and to embody the flexibility and creativity of human language.

Linguistics,Computer Science,Education
An Analysis and Evaluation of Krashen's Monitor Model in the Context of Second Language Learning.

Mahmudul Hassan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v4i3.11103

2022-11-27

Abstract:Krashen's Monitor Model is likely the most often quoted second language acquisition theory and has frequently dominated education discourse. This essay evaluates Krashen's Monitor Model critically. It gives a thorough analysis of the model's underlying assumptions, explains each of the five hypotheses, and addresses objections to the theory based on relevant empirical evidence.
Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Markedness Theory, Universal Grammar and Monitor Theory and their Contributions to Second Language Learning

M. Khalifa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/IJL.V10I1.12479

2018-01-14

Abstract:Theories of second language acquisition (SLA) play an important role in second language (L2) learning. These theories can help both language teachers and their students to understand L2 language learning process. There are various theories and approaches of SLA which try to explain how L2 learning takes place. Each theory accounts for L2 acquisition from a different perspective. This paper describes and compares five theories of L2 acquisition: Contrastive Analysis (CA), Error Analysis (EA), Markedness Theory, Universal Grammar (UG) and Monitor Theory, explains their contributions to L2 learning and shows the criticism of each theory. First, in Contrastive Analysis, the weak and strong hypotheses and types of language transfer are explained. Second, in Error Analysis, attitudes towards errors and aims, process and models of Error Analysis are described. Third, in Markedness Theory, the role of typological markedness in the explanation of L2 learning, the Markedness Differential Hypothesis (MDH) and the Structural Conformity Hypothesis (SCH) are explained. Fourth, in Universal Grammar, it is shown that L2 acquisition occurs on the basis of first language (L1) acquisition: L2 acquisition is a matter of setting the correct L2 parameters. The Language Acquisition Device (LAD) and L2 access to UG are explained. Finally, in Monitor Theory, it is suggested that comprehensible input is crucial for L2 acquisition and the five hypotheses of the theory are explained: (a) The Input Hypothesis, (b) The Learning-Acquisition Hypothesis, (c) The Monitor Hypothesis, (d) The Natural Order Hypothesis and (e) The Affective Filter Hypothesis.

Linguistics,Computer Science,Education
Hypothesis of Interaction: Reflections on its Theoretical and Practical Contributions for Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

Ahmed A. Al Khateeb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v2n3p294

2014-09-24

Studies in English Language Teaching

Abstract:This article is about one of the most influential hypothesis in the fields of applied linguistics and language learning. It is based on the work of a number of scholars who contributed to the understanding of this hypothesis such as Steve Krashen, Mike Long, Teresa Pica and Merrill Swain. It starts with a brief introduction about the significance of interaction hypothesis generally in language learning in general and its central role in second language acquisition (SLA). The next section reviews some of the fundamental works and studies that have investigated the theoretical and practical understanding of this phenomenon and its relationship to learners’ achievement. It also highlights the contribution of interaction hypothesis to learning in two basic areas: noticing and feedback. There are explanatory examples presented in the following section in order to show how interactional modification techniques are used by learners. The last section presents some concluding thoughts pertaining to this topic with a focus on how it can be employed in language learning classrooms.

English Else
Cognitive linguistics-inspired language instruction

Jie Qin,Dilin Liu,Lei Lei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444824000119

2024-05-10

Language Teaching

Abstract:Second language acquisition (SLA) or second/foreign language teaching has been influenced to various degrees by key linguistic theories, including structural linguistics (Bloomfield, 1933; Saussure, 1959), generative linguistics (Chomsky, 1957, 1965), systemic functional linguistics (Halliday, 1973), and, more recently, contemporary Cognitive Linguistics (CL; Goldberg, 1995; Lakoff, 1987, 1993; Langacker, 1987, 1991; Talmy, 1988, 2000), a theory composed of several related linguistic approaches often viewed as a response or complement to generative linguistics. While structural linguistics, generative linguistics, and systemic functional linguistics have each provided a theoretical impetus for one or more of the prominent language teaching methods or approaches over the past century (such as the Audiolingual method, the Natural method, and the Communicative Language Teaching method), CL, as a newcomer, has begun to exert a growing influence since the early 1990s. Given that the purpose of this research timeline article is to present a historical overview of the key thoughts and studies on CL-inspired approaches to instructed second language acquisition (ISLA), 1 a brief discussion of CL's main differences from the other linguistic theories and its key theoretical tenets is in order.

education & educational research,linguistics

The Inspiration of Language Input Hypothesis to Foreign Language Teaching

Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Affective Filter Hypothesis and Their Enlightenment to English Teaching in China

The Input Hypothesis: An Inside Look

An Exploration about Krashen's Input Hypothesis in the Computer Network Environment

A Review of Krashen’s Input Theory

Krashen’s Input Hypothesis Revisited: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Two Readers Comment on Stephen Krashen's Input Hypothesis: Testing the Relationsbip of Formal Instruction to the Input Hypothesis

Implications of Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Affective Filter Hypothesis in College English Teaching

Krashen Revisited: Case Study of the Role of Input, Motivation and Identity in Second Language Learning

A Study on Using Noticing Hypothesis to Improve Learners’ Language Input in Language Learning

KRASHEN'S THEORY OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Krashen's Input Hypothesis of L2 and the streaming teaching of listening

The Application of Input-output Hypothesis in English Listening Teaching

On the Scope, Claims and Implications of Krashen’s Theory

Study on the Significance of the Input Hypothesis to English Teaching

Krashen's second language acquisition, a theory or hypothesis: An analytical study

Language Input and Output in SLA Learning

An Analysis and Evaluation of Krashen's Monitor Model in the Context of Second Language Learning.

Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Markedness Theory, Universal Grammar and Monitor Theory and their Contributions to Second Language Learning

Hypothesis of Interaction: Reflections on its Theoretical and Practical Contributions for Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

Cognitive linguistics-inspired language instruction