Teaching art versus teaching taste: what art teachers can learn from looking at a cross-cultural evaluation of children's art

David Pariser,Axel van den Berg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-422x(01)00032-8

IF: 1.857

2001-12-01

Poetics

Abstract:In this article we extend our work on the limitations of the Gardner and Winner U-curved artistic development hypothesis [Gardner, Howard, Winner, Ellen, 1982. First intimations of artistry. In: Strauss, S. (Ed.), U-shaped Development. Academic Press, New York, pp. 147–168]. In our previous work we have cast serious doubt on the supposed universal validity of that thesis by showing that non-Western judges do not necessarily assess the aesthetic merits of a given set of drawings in the same way as do the Western judges used in the research allegedly supporting the U-curve hypothesis. While we were able almost perfectly to replicate the characteristic U-curve using Western judges—with drawings made by very young children ranked almost as highly as those of mature artists—Chinese-educated judges assessing the same sample of drawings produced an upward-sloping curve in which the drawings of the youngest children ranked lowest. In this article we begin to explore the reasons behind this apparent inter-cultural difference in aesthetic judgement. On the basis of hints from a recent pilot study as well as from what is known about characteristic differences between Western and Chinese cultural standards, we hypothesize that the difference between the Western and Chinese judges’ evaluations in our earlier study might be due to differences in their appreciation of the degree of graphic skill displayed in the drawings they were asked to assess. Whereas Westerners with an art-education background are likely to be steeped in a Modernist aesthetic which values unspoilt originality above all else and which tends to downgrade technical skill, Chinese culture reputedly values skill and technique as necessary pre-conditions for artistic expression. In order to test this hypothesis we had independent judges score each drawing in the sample according to the relative amount of graphic skill it displayed. We then correlated the skill scores with the aesthetic evaluations of our initial Western and Chinese-educated judges. The results provide moderate support for our hypothesis. The Chinese-educated judges’ assessments are consistently more strongly correlated with level of graphic skill than those of the Western judges. While the Western judges did appear to appreciate skill as a part of the aesthetic value of a drawing, they did so only for the drawings produced by adolescent and adult artists. Their assessment of the work of non-artists did not appear to have anything to do with the skill level shown. The Chinese-educated judges, by contrast, seemed to hold skill in higher esteem than the Western judges and did so across all age/skill groups.

sociology