Evaluation of a sensitive blood test for the detection of colorectal advanced adenomas in a prospective cohort using a multiomics approach.

Jimmy Lin,Eric Ariazi,Michael Dzamba,Teng-Kuei Hsu,Steven Kothen-Hill,Kang Li,Tzu-Yu Liu,Shivani Mahajan,Krishnan K Palaniappan,Amit Pasupathy,Alina Polonskaia,John St. John,Dan Steiger,Peter Ulz,Irving Wang,Jiajie Xiao,Rui Yang,Girish Putcha,Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.43
IF: 45.3
2021-01-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:43 Background: Blood-based screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) with high sensitivity and specificity are needed to improve adherence, facilitate early detection, and ultimately reduce mortality from CRC. Current stool-based tests have a sensitivity of 24-42% for colorectal advanced adenomas (AAs), while blood tests that rely on tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation signatures have shown limited sensitivity for AAs. Here we demonstrate the ability to detect AAs from blood using a multiomics test that incorporates both tumor- and immune-derived signatures, and compare it to the performance of a cfDNA methylation-only test. Methods: Participants enrolled in a prospective study (NCT03688906) were included in this analysis. The multiomics test includes signatures for cell-free nucleic acids based on next-generation sequencing, and for plasma proteins based on high-throughput multiplexed assays. Signatures are integrated computationally with a combination of convolutional neural networks and regularized logistic regression. We compared the multiomics test with one based on cfDNA methylation only. Results: This sub-study included 542 participants (AA: n = 122; colonoscopy-confirmed negative controls: n = 420). Participants with AA were 56% male with a mean age of 63 years, and colonoscopy-confirmed negative controls were 54% male with a mean age of 61 years. The multiomics test achieved a sensitivity of 41% (n = 50/122, 95% CI 34-48%) at 90% specificity (377/420). By contrast, the cfDNA methylation-only test achieved a sensitivity of 20% (24/122, 95% CI 15-25%) at 91% specificity (383/420). Performance was also analyzed by histological subtype and location, and superiority of the multiomics test to the cfDNA-methylation-only test was consistently observed. Conclusions: A novel multiomics blood test can detect colorectal AAs at a sensitivity and specificity comparable to existing stool-based tests. Combining signatures from both tumor- and immune-derived sources resulted in AA sensitivity greater than that of cfDNA-methylation alone.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?