Revision Strategy for Proximal Junctional Failure: Combined Effect of Proximal Extension and Focal Correction

Renaud Lafage,Han-Jo Kim,Robert K. Eastlack,Alan H. Daniels,Bassel G. Diebo,Greg Mundis,Marc Khalifé,Justin S. Smith,Shay R. Bess,Christopher I. Shaffrey,Christopher P. Ames,Douglas C. Burton,Munish C. Gupta,Eric O. Klineberg,Frank J. Schwab,Virginie Lafage,ISSG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241254805
2024-05-15
Global Spine Journal
Abstract:Global Spine Journal, Ahead of Print. Study designRetrospective review of a prospectively-collected multicenter database.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to determine optimal strategies in terms of focal angular correction and length of proximal extension during revision for PJF.Methods134 patients requiring proximal extension for PJF were analyzed in this study. The correlation between amount of proximal junctional angle (PJA) reduction and recurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or PJF was investigated. Following stratification by the degree of PJK correction and the numbers of levels extended proximally, rates of radiographic PJK (PJA >28° & ΔPJA >22°), and recurrent surgery for PJF were reported.ResultsBefore revision, mean PJA was 27.6° ± 14.6°. Mean number of levels extended was 6.0 ± 3.3. Average PJA reduction was 18.8° ± 18.9°. A correlation between the degree of PJA reduction and rate of recurrent PJK was observed (r = −.222). Recurrent radiographic PJK (0%) and clinical PJF (4.5%) were rare in patients undergoing extension ≥8 levels, regardless of angular correction. Patients with small reductions (<5°) and small extensions ( 30°) and extensions <8 levels had the highest rate of recurrent PJK (31.8%) and PJF (16.0%).ConclusionWhile the degree of focal PJK correction must be determined by the treating surgeon based upon clinical goals, recurrent PJK may be minimized by limiting reduction to <30°. If larger PJA correction is required, more extensive proximal fusion constructs may mitigate recurrent PJK/PJF rates.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?