When all males cheat post-copulatory competition limits worthless gift-giving frequency in spiders

Camila Pavón-Peláez,Mauro Martínez Villar,Valentina Franco-Trecu,Maria J. Albo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10325-0
IF: 2.074
2024-12-05
Evolutionary Ecology
Abstract:Environmental conditions together with agents of sexual selection (i.e., mate competition) regulate the expression of mating tactics. Likewise, alternative tactics arise when resources needed for reproduction are limited. These tactics are commonly performed by less competitive males (e.g. small size) and restricted to low frequencies in the population. Exceptionally, in the gift-giving spider Paratrechalea ornata the deceptive tactic frequencies can range between 0 and 80% throughout the mating season. Males offer nutritive gifts (prey wrapped in silk), but they can very often wrap inedible items offering worthless gifts as an alternative tactic. The gift is presented by males during courtship, and females can only recognize the content, and therefore the deception, once they have accepted the mating. Although, receiving food gifts have a positive effect on females' fecundity, producing and offering it can be costly for males. We tested the hypothesis that the frequency shifts in worthless gift-giving are the result of the interaction between prey availability, post-copulatory competition and individual size altering the benefits and costs associated with each gift type. In the field, we found that the deceptive tactic is performed by all males regardless of their size. Small and medium males mostly produced worthless gifts under low prey availability and high post-copulatory competition; whereas large males were not affected by prey availability, producing worthless gifts only under low post-copulatory competition. To further understand how mate competition affects less competitive males, we disentangled the potential effects on medium size males by conducting experiments with constant prey availability. We found that under post-copulatory competition, males increased the production of worthless gifts compared to males exposed to pre-copulatory or no competition. In this treatment all males acquired a mating, though with reduced mating duration. Altogether, our findings support that post-copulatory competition limits the deceptive gift-giving tactic, creating the observed shifts in the frequencies throughout the mating season.
ecology,genetics & heredity,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?