Clinical Analysis of Microwave Ablation Combined with Decompression and Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases
Yangming Zhang,Xiang Fang,Lin Luo,Yan Xiong,Wenli Zhang,Yawei Gou,Chunfu Gong,Zhou Xiang,Fuguo Kuang,Hong Duan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14063
2024-04-23
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:With the continuous development of microwave technology in spinal tumors, our study, through a comparative analysis of the combination of traditional surgical methods with microwave therapy for the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors, reveals that compared to standalone treatment approaches, the combination of microwave ablation with pedicle screw fixation and vertebral decompression surgery is a superior therapeutic modality for spinal metastatic tumors. Objectives There is still controversy over the choice of treatment for end‐stage spinal metastases. With the continuous development of microwave technology in spinal tumors, related studies have reported that microwave combined with techniques such as pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous vertebroplasty can achieve the purpose of tumor ablation, relieving spinal cord compression, enhancing spinal stability, effectively relieving pain, and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation in the palliative management of spinal metastases with pathological fractures. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with spinal metastases and pathological fractures treated between January 2016 and July 2020, with 44 patients undergoing pedicle screw fixation along with laminectomy (fixation group) and the remaining 38 receiving microwave ablation in addition to the treatment provided to group fixation (MWA group). Before surgery, all patients underwent pain assessment using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and evaluation of spinal cord injury using the Frankel classification. After surgery, the patients' prognoses were assessed using the Tomita score, modified Tokuhashi score system, and progression‐free survival. Additionally, we compared operative time and blood loss between the two groups. Survival analysis utilized the Kaplan–Meier method with a log‐rank test for group comparisons. Paired t‐tests and the Mann–Whitney U test were applied to metric and non‐normally distributed data, respectively. Neurological function improvement across groups was evaluated using the χ2 test. Results All patients were followed up for a median duration of 18 and 20 months in the fixation and MWA groups, respectively, with follow‐up periods ranging from 6 to 36 months. Statistically significant reductions in postoperative VAS scores were observed in all patients compared with their preoperative scores. The MWA group exhibited reduced blood loss (t = 2.74, p = 0.01), lower VAS scores at the 1‐ and 3‐month follow‐ups (t = 2.34, P = 0.02; t = 2.83, p = 0.006), and longer progression‐free survival than the fixation group (p = 0.03). Although the operation times in the MWA group were longer than those in the fixation group, this difference was not statistically significant (t = 6.06, p = 0.12). No statistically significant differences were found regarding improvements in spinal cord function between the two groups (p = 0.77). Conclusion Compared with decompression and pedicle screw fixation for treating spinal metastases with pathological fractures, microwave ablation combined with decompression and pedicle screw fixation showed better outcomes in terms of pain control, longer progression‐free survival, and lower blood loss without increasing operative time, which has favorable implications for clinical practice.
orthopedics