Abstract:Study design: Retrospective evaluation of 19 consecutive patients with sacral fracture dislocations and cauda equina syndrome. Objective: To review the safety and patient impact of early surgical decompression, and rigid segmental stabilization in patients with high-grade sacral fracture dislocations. Summary of background data: The ideal treatment for patients presenting with fracture dislocations of the sacrum resulting from high-energy mechanisms remains unknown. Previous studies consisted of multicenter case reviews that showed satisfactory outcomes with either nonoperative or a variety of surgical methods. However, over the last 20 years, no consistent treatment algorithm for these severe injuries has emerged. The advent of rigid, low-profile segmental fixation of the lumbar spine to the pelvic ring has offered a solution to many of the surgical challenges. This study evaluates the rate of complications of this method. It is intended to serve as a foundation for further evaluation and development of this treatment strategy, and as a basis for future comparison studies. Methods: Patients were treated with a formally established algorithm, including resuscitation, and clinical assessment with detailed neurologic assessment and radiographic workup with pelvic computerized tomography and reformatted views. Electrophysiologic testing was conducted to confirm the presence of sacral plexus injuries in patients who were unable to be examined. Patients received neural element decompression and open reduction with segmental internal fixation through a midline posterior approach by connecting lower lumbar pedicle screws to long iliac screws when the patient's general medical condition allowed for surgical intervention. A formal sacroiliac arthrodesis was not performed. For the purposes of this study, patients were assessed specifically for the following adverse events: (1) infection, (2) wound healing, (3) neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment, (4) postoperative loss of sacral fracture reduction, (5) instrumentation failure, (6) axial lumbopelvic pain requiring further treatment, and (7) unplanned secondary surgery. Results: There were 19 patients with an average age of 32 years treated according to this algorithm. Fracture reduction was successfully maintained in all patients. During the index surgical intervention, 14/19 patients (74%) had had either a traumatic dural tear or nerve root avulsion. Major complications involved fracture of the connecting rods in 6/19 patients (31%) and wound healing disturbances in 5/19 (26%). There were no lasting complications such as chronic osteomyelitis noted. In patients followed over a 1-year period, the visual analog score, referable to the sacral injury, averaged 5.5 on a scale of 0-10. Conclusions: Rigid segmental lumbopelvic stabilization allowed for reliable fracture reduction of the lumbosacral spine and posterior pelvic ring, permitting early mobilization without external immobilizaton and neurologic improvement in a large number of patients. Complications were primarily related to infection, wound healing, and asymptomatic rod breakage, and were without long-term sequelae.

Treatment outcomes of lower urinary tract symptoms due to fragility sacral fractures: A review of eight patients and literature

Comparative Effectiveness Of Nonsurgical Treatment For Stress Urinary Incontinence In Adult Women: A Systematic Review And Network Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Surgical Treatment Of Sacral Fractures Following Lumbosacral Arthrodesis: Case Report And Literature Review

Triangular osteosynthesis and lumbopelvic fixation as a valid surgical treatment in posterior pelvic ring lesions: a systematic review

Sacral Insufficiency Fracture Following Short-Segment Lumbosacral Fusion: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Surgical management strategies for unstable sacral fractures: Case series and surgical guideline

Assessment of the Initial Diagnostic Accuracy of a Fragility Fracture of the Sacrum: A Study of 56 Patients

Operative versus conservative treatment in pelvic ring fractures with sacral involvement

Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation

Complications associated with surgical stabilization of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability

Incidence and Risk Factors of Sacral Fracture Following Lumbosacral Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years: A Case-Control Study

Surgical treatment of metastatic sacral tumors

Surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: short-term outcomes of 42 patients

Feasibility and Safety of 3D-Navigated Trans-Sacral Bar Osteosynthesis for Fragility Fractures of the Sacrum: FIRST Clinical Experiences

Midline Sacral Fractures: Review of the Literature

Effective Management of Sacral Stress Fractures in Gastric Cancer: Iliosacral Screw Fixation Following a Type 3 Hemipelvectomy

Sacral Stress Fracture in Athletes With Overuse: A Clinical Series of 11 Patients and Literature Review

Conservative treatment of fragility fracture of the pelvis: A retrospective study

[Evaluation of closed multi-axial screws iliosacral fixation system combined with posterior segmental spinal fixation for treatment of unstable sacral fractures]

Clinical Features and Therapeutic Process of Sacral Fatigue Fractures in Adolescents

[Sacral fractures in geriatric patients]