Association between Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Incompetent Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sindhu Sekar,Sujeewa Fernando,Srividhya Budithi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102763
IF: 2.156
2024-03-03
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
Abstract:Objective : We aimed to determine the association between polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and cervical incompetence (CI). We hypothesise that insulin resistance induces a glucose metabolism disorder that could potentially cause cervical incompetence, resulting in an adverse outcome. Design : We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to summarise the evidence regarding the strength of the association of occurrence of CI in a PCOS pregnant woman compared to a non-PCOS pregnant woman. We defined PCOS as the presence of two of the three Rotterdam criteria, and a combination of clinical symptoms and ultrasound findings were used to diagnose CI. Method : This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) reporting standards and the PROSPERO registration. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify observational studies up to December 2022. We included studies in English which compared the PCOS and non-PCOS pregnant women who were diagnosed using Rotterdam criteria and subsequently developed CI in the same pregnancy. We excluded the studies which did not report CI as an outcome. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias (JBI critical appraisal tools). In the meta-analysis, effect estimates were pooled using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was measured using I 2 statistics. Results : We identified 23 articles, of which 19 were screened, and three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three observational studies reported the data of 3845 pregnant women with PCOS and 9449 pregnant women without PCOS. One hundred and forty-one (3.7%) pregnant women with PCOS developed CI compared to 58 (0.6%) non-PCOS pregnant women [Risk ratio: 5.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.9-14.6; I 2 : 89%]. Of the three studies included, two had a low risk of bias, and one had a moderate risk of bias. Conclusion : The findings of the review suggested higher risk of CI in a pregnant woman with PCOS compared to pregnant women without PCOS. These findings highlight the necessity of establishing guidelines for early identification of CI in PCOS pregnant mothers to prevent adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes following preterm labour.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?