P181 Combination of EPIC-CD epigenetic signatures accurately identifies non-response to multiple biologics in patients with active Crohn’s disease

V Joustra,A Li Yim,P Henneman,H Ishtu,T de Waard,L Evgeni,A Noble,S van Zon,T Chapman,C McGregor,A Adams,J Satsangi,W de Jonge,G D'Haens
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0311
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background While the introduction of biologicals has revolutionized Crohn’s disease (CD) care, the current trial-and-error approach to treatment selection is insufficient, emphasizing the unmet need for predictive biomarkers. We previously developed 2 distinct panels of 25- and 68 epigenetic markers that were accurately associated with (non-)response to vedolizumab (VDZ) or ustekinumab (USTE) in both anti-TNF naïve and experienced patients. In this analysis of the EPIC-CD study, we examined how both models performed in detecting Crohn’s disease patients unresponsive to treatment with multiple biological agents. Methods We measured peripheral blood DNA methylation profiles in an independent cohort of adult CD patients that were sequentially treated with anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab), VDZ and/or USTE using the Illumina EPIC BeadChip array. Treatment failure was determined using objective outcome measures including endoscopy, MRI or the need for resection combined with clinical- and biochemical parameters (CRP and/or fecal calprotectin (FCP)). Using raw methylation data and our previously developed VDZ and USTE models, predictions were generated, and the percentages of true and false negatives were subsequently calculated. Results We included 34 CD patients (53% females, median age 36, median disease duration 13 years). Of these, 27 patients had a history of VDZ failure, 26 had experienced USTE failure, and 19 had failed both VDZ and USTE determined with endoscopy (82%), MRI (6%), or surgical resection (12%) and supplemented by CRP (35%) and/or FCP (47%) and clinical outcome assessment (94%). Notably, we observed a substantial proportion of patients with extensive disease location (67.6%), perianal disease (52.9%), and/or a history of IBD-related surgery (70.6%), underscoring the therapy-refractory nature of this cohort. Both VDZ- and USTE-response prediction models demonstrated accurate prediction of non-response, with a true negative rate of 89% (24 out of 27) for VDZ and 92% (24 out of 26) for USTE. When specifically targeting patients who failed both VDZ and USTE, the models correctly identified 16 out of 19 (84%) as non-responders. Twelve of these 19 patients (75%) had previously failed anti-TNF treatment. Conclusion We demonstrate the predictive power of the EPIC-CD epigenetic signatures to effectively identify patients that failed both VDZ and USTE treatment. Our results hold considerable clinical significance, as accurately pinpointing non-response to a combination of multiple biological agents enables clinicians to directly consider alternative modes-of-action, such as JAK inhibitors.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?