Deep learning predicted perceived age is a reliable approach for analysis of facial ageing: A proof of principle study

Conor Turner,Luba M. Pardo,David A. Gunn,Ruediger Zillmer,Selma Mekić,Fan Liu,M. Arfan Ikram,Caroline C. W. Klaver,Pauline H. Croll,André Goedegebure,Katerina Trajanoska,Fernando Rivadeneira,Maryam Kavousi,Guy G. O. Brusselle,Manfred Kayser,Tamar Nijsten,Jaume Bacardit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20365
2024-10-05
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Abstract:We aim to assess whether deep learning (DL) methods can be used to automate the estimation of perceived age (PA) using facial photographs. PA has been shown to be associated with age‐related outcomes in previous studies. We used state‐of‐the‐art machine learning approaches to calculate PA and tested for associations with outcomes that were previously associated with human annotated PA as a proof of principle. We found that DL approaches can estimate PA accurately, with a mean average error (MAE) of predicted PA between 2.4 and 2.8 years of accuracy, which was lower than the best current published DL model estimations of PA. We found similar effect sizes of previous associations between age‐related diseases and DL‐estimated PA. As proof of principle, we also tested for associations between MCR1 variants and DL‐estimated PA. These variants are known to be associated with pigmentation, skin cancer and also PA. We replicated the associations in this study, which confirms that the DL‐PA is as accurate as human‐annotated PA. This represents a major step forward in the use of PA as a marker for intrinsic ageing for clinical and epidemiological studies as it will reduce both costs and bias in the assessment of PA without loss in the accuracy of predictions. Background Perceived age (PA) has been associated with mortality, genetic variants linked to ageing and several age‐related morbidities. However, estimating PA in large datasets is laborious and costly to generate, limiting its practical applicability. Objectives To determine if estimating PA using deep learning‐based algorithms results in the same associations with morbidities and genetic variants as human‐estimated perceived age. Methods Self‐supervised learning (SSL) and deep feature transfer (DFT) deep learning (DL) approaches were trained and tested on human‐estimated PAs and their corresponding frontal face images of middle‐aged to elderly Dutch participants (n = 2679) from a population‐based study in the Netherlands. We compared the DL‐estimated PAs with morbidities previously associated with human‐estimated PA as well as genetic variants in the gene MC1R; we additionally tested the PA associations with MC1R in a new validation cohort (n = 1158). Results The DL approaches predicted PA in this population with a mean absolute error of 2.84 years (DFT) and 2.39 years (SSL). In the training–test dataset, we found the same significant (p
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?