Abstract:Background: Smoking causes about 20% of all cancers and about 30% of all cancer deaths in the U.S (ACS, 2024). Smoking increases the risk for cancers of the mouth, larynx, pharynx, esophagus, kidney, cervix, breast, liver, bladder, pancreas, stomach, colon, and acute myeloid leukemia and there is no safe form of tobacco smoke (CDC, 2023; ACS, 2024). This study aims to inform public health strategies that can mitigate smoking related disparities and improve health outcomes for marginalized populations. Methods: This study assessed the prevalence of cigarette smoking by demographic characteristics among California adults. We used secondary data from the 2019 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) that was collected through a random-digit dial telephone survey. Adults ages 18+ were interviewed. We utilized secondary data comprised of 22,160 participants. We conducted interactions between gender and race/ethnicity, and one's smoking status. Multinomial logistic regression test was conducted to predict the probability of participants' level. This study was approved by the researchers Institutional Review Board. Results: Majority or participants were non-smokers (93.1%), mostly females (51.2%,). Many had a bachelor's degree (23.9%) or some college, vocational training, or an associate degree (22.8%). Many participants (59.8%) were married/living with a partner, and (25.7%) were single. Most participants spoke English (55.4%) and the largest race/ethnic groups were White (40.2%) followed by Latinos (21.8%). Age distribution was as follows: 18–29 (22.9%), 30–39 (17.6%), and 40–49-year-olds (16.2%). For low-intensity smokers , in terms of race/ethnicity, Latino participants were less likely to be low-intensity smokers relative to non-smokers in comparison to White participants (RRR = .411, p = .043). For moderate-intensity smokers , education was statistically significant, with participants holding a graduate degree being significantly less likely to be moderate-intensity smokers relative to non-smokers in comparison to participants who had a HS degree (RRR = .068, p = .025). For high-intensity smokers , single participants were more likely to be high-intensity smokers compared to those married or living with a partner (RRR = 2.72, p = .011). In terms of age, only participants that were 30 to 39 years old were statistically significant, with this group more likely to be high-intensity smokers relative to non-smokers in comparison to participants who were 20 to 29 years of age (RRR = 3.40, p = .031). Conclusion: Findings suggest that one's demographics characteristics does play a role in smoking consumption rates. Addressing disparities in smoking and cancer requires a multifaceted approach that includes policy changes, targeted interventions, and improved access to healthcare and smoking cessation resources. Hence, public health efforts should create evidence-based interventions and consider the social, economic, and cultural contexts of target populations to reduce disparities in smoking and cancer. Citation Format: Salome Kapella Mshigeni, Anhthu Nguyen, Julian C Sacdalan, Elizabeth Pinder-McSwain, Felipe Aperador Tarazona. Assessing cigarette smoking intensity among California adults and the need for tailored interventions to reduce health disparities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl) nr A093.

Smoking Discrimination Moderates the Relationship between Smoking Stigma and Cigarettes Per Day among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals

Discrimination, identity connectedness and tobacco use in a sample of sexual and gender minority young adults

Minority stressors and tobacco use among a US sample of sexual and gender minority young adults

Perceived racial/ethnic discrimination and cigarette smoking behaviors among a sample of people with HIV

The Indirect Effects of Negative Affect Reduction Motives on the Relationship Between Sex and Severity of Problems When Trying to Quit Among Black Adults Who Smoke

Effects of sexual/gender minority- and race-based enacted stigma on mental health and substance use in female assigned at birth sexual minority youth.

Resistance to anti-smoking messages related to the higher smoking stigma of Korean female smokers

Race/ethnicity-based discrimination, depressive symptoms, and smoking-related variables among people with HIV participating in a randomized clinical trial for cigarette smoking cessation

Identifying the ways in which tobacco cessation interventions have been tailored for sexual and gender minority individuals: A systematic review

E-Cigarette Use among Sexual Minoritized Women and Nonbinary People Assigned Female at Birth: Assessing the Roles of Discrimination, Perceived Stress, and Social Support

Cigarette Smoking Motives and Stages of Change in Smoking Cessation Among Veterans: Differences by Gender and Sexual Orientation

Minority Stress, Structural Stigma, and Physical Health Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals: Examining the Relative Strength of the Relationships

Abstract A093: Assessing cigarette smoking intensity among California adults and the need for tailored interventions to reduce health disparities

Real‐world analysis of the relationships between smoking, lung cancer stigma, and emotional functioning

Association between perceived health risks of e-cigarettes and actual e-cigarette use, based on cigarette smoking status and sexual and gender minority status among U.S. adults

Results from Wave 5 of the Population Assessment for Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study

Trends in mental health and smoking disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual adults in Canada, 2003-2020

Depressive Symptoms among Heavy Cigarette Smokers: the Influence of Daily Rate, Gender, and Race

The association between discrimination and drinking among sexual minorities: A daily diary study

Visible and concealable stigmatized identities and mental health: Experiences of racial discrimination and anticipated stigma.

Interpersonal ethnic–racial discrimination and tobacco products: The moderating role of critical action.