0318 Algorithmic Identification of Space-Time Profiles of Slow Oscillations: Dataset Constrains and Use Examples

Paola Malerba,Ali Snedden,Sara C Mednick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0318
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Given the importance of sleep oscillations in cognition and health, we introduce a data-driven method to analyze slow oscillations (SOs, 0.5-1.5 Hz) as events that differentiate in their space-time co-emergence on the electrode manifold. This approach has identified properties of SO organization that are relevant to function, and that can change in clinical populations. This study formalizes this technique by parameterizing its domain of applicability in terms of dataset properties (e.g., number of participants (N), density of electrodes in the acquisition cap (E)). We define strategies to conduct parameterization of the algorithm and identify the minimum dataset properties required for successful identification of different SO profiles (i.e., Global, Local and Frontal SOs). Methods We apply our algorithm to three datasets of healthy young adults: Set1 (N=22, E=58) and Set 2 (N=34, E=24) with nighttime sleep, Set 3 (N= 54, E=24) with daytime sleep (naps). Set 3 showed a count of SOs comparable to Set2. SOs were detected at each channel separately. Role of electrode density was tested by down-sampling Set1 to 24 and 8 channel conditions and Set2 to 8 channels, reflecting standard caps, and assessing the confusion matrix in relation to the full montage. Sample size was tested by randomly selecting subsets of 22 participants from Set2 ten times, and comparing outcomes to original dataset labels. Daytime vs nighttime sleep was evaluated comparing outcomes for Set3 to outcomes of truncating Set1 and Set2 sleep 90 minutes after the first detected SO. Percentages of SO of each type were related to demographics (age, sex) in scatterplots. Results We found that identification of SO space-time profiles required at least 22 participants and at least a 24 head-electrode montage, whereas 8 head-electrodes configurations, typical of clinically acquired sleep, were not sufficient. Daytime sleep did not show Global, Local, Frontal SO profiles, while early nighttime sleep did. Conclusion This study introduces an open-access code to promote the investigation of SO space-time organization, describing its domain of applicability and exploring the role of demographics in SO profiles. Algorithmic outcomes for daytime sleep suggest a potential role of sleep pressure in shaping SO profiles. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?