Abstract:This study examines issues of algorithmic fairness in the context of systems that inform tax audit selection by the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS). While the field of algorithmic fairness has developed primarily around notions of treating like individuals alike, we instead explore the concept of vertical equity -- appropriately accounting for relevant differences across individuals -- which is a central component of fairness in many public policy settings. Applied to the design of the U.S. individual income tax system, vertical equity relates to the fair allocation of tax and enforcement burdens across taxpayers of different income levels. Through a unique collaboration with the Treasury Department and IRS, we use access to anonymized individual taxpayer microdata, risk-selected audits, and random audits from 2010-14 to study vertical equity in tax administration. In particular, we assess how the use of modern machine learning methods for selecting audits may affect vertical equity. First, we show how the use of more flexible machine learning (classification) methods -- as opposed to simpler models -- shifts audit burdens from high to middle-income taxpayers. Second, we show that while existing algorithmic fairness techniques can mitigate some disparities across income, they can incur a steep cost to performance. Third, we show that the choice of whether to treat risk of underreporting as a classification or regression problem is highly consequential. Moving from classification to regression models to predict underreporting shifts audit burden substantially toward high income individuals, while increasing revenue. Last, we explore the role of differential audit cost in shaping the audit distribution. We show that a narrow focus on return-on-investment can undermine vertical equity. Our results have implications for the design of algorithmic tools across the public sector.

Data-driven auditing of business and self-employment earnings

Dynamic effects of tax audits and the role of intentions

The Effect of Auditing on Promoting Exports: Evidence from Private Firms in Emerging Markets

Tax Evasion, Audits with Memory, and Portfolio Choice

OPTIMAL INVESTMENT AND CONSUMPTION IN THE MARKET WITH JUMP RISK AND CAPITAL GAINS TAX

Measuring and Mitigating Racial Disparities in Tax Audits

A Welfare Analysis of Tax Audits Across the Income Distribution

Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax Audit Models

Microscopic models for the study of taxpayer audit effects

Gaming the System: An Investigation of Small Business Owners' Attitudes to Tax Avoidance, Tax Planning, and Tax Evasion

Using deep Q-learning to understand the tax evasion behavior of risk-averse firms

Adults in the room? The auditor and dividends in small firms: evidence from a natural experiment

Integrating Reward Maximization and Population Estimation: Sequential Decision-Making for Internal Revenue Service Audit Selection

A three-state kinetic agent-based model to analyze tax evasion dynamics

External audit and tax evasion: evidence from India

A self-employed taxpayer experimental study on trust, power, and tax compliance in eleven countries

A dynamic model of Tax Evasion

Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Management: An Empirical Analysis in the Indian Context

Appealing, threatening or nudging? Assessing various communication strategies to promote tax compliance

Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement

Earnings management risk and audit pricing: Evidence from big bath accounting