Abstract:AI-assisted decision-making that impacts individuals raises critical questions about transparency and fairness in artificial intelligence (AI). Much research has highlighted the reciprocal relationships between the transparency/explanation and fairness in AI-assisted decision-making. Thus, considering their impact on user trust or perceived fairness simultaneously benefits responsible use of socio-technical AI systems, but currently receives little attention. In this paper, we investigate the effects of AI explanations and fairness on human-AI trust and perceived fairness, respectively, in specific AI-based decision-making scenarios. A user study simulating AI-assisted decision-making in two health insurance and medical treatment decision-making scenarios provided important insights. Due to the global pandemic and restrictions thereof, the user studies were conducted as online surveys. From the participant’s trust perspective, fairness was found to affect user trust only under the condition of a low fairness level, with the low fairness level reducing user trust. However, adding explanations helped users increase their trust in AI-assisted decision-making. From the perspective of perceived fairness, our work found that low levels of introduced fairness decreased users’ perceptions of fairness, while high levels of introduced fairness increased users’ perceptions of fairness. The addition of explanations definitely increased the perception of fairness. Furthermore, we found that application scenarios influenced trust and perceptions of fairness. The results show that the use of AI explanations and fairness statements in AI applications is complex: we need to consider not only the type of explanations and the degree of fairness introduced, but also the scenarios in which AI-assisted decision-making is used.

Explainable AI and Adoption of Financial Algorithmic Advisors: an Experimental Study

Explainable AI for Psychological Profiling from Digital Footprints: A Case Study of Big Five Personality Predictions from Spending Data

Explanation matters: An experimental study on explainable AI

Explain To Decide: A Human-Centric Review on the Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in AI-assisted Decision Making

Explaining AI in Finance: Past, Present, Prospects

Automated Economic Welfare for Everyone? Examining Barriers to Adopting Robo-Advisors from the Perspective of Explainable Artificial Intelligence

A Comprehensive Review on Financial Explainable AI

Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoring

Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Banking and Financial Services

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in finance: a systematic literature review

A user-centered explainable artificial intelligence approach for financial fraud detection

Exploring Explainable AI in the Financial Sector: Perspectives of Banks and Supervisory Authorities

Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations

Explainable Automated Machine Learning for Credit Decisions: Enhancing Human Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in Financial Engineering

A Hypothesis on Good Practices for AI-based Systems for Financial Time Series Forecasting: Towards Domain-Driven XAI Methods

Initial evidence for biased decision-making despite human-centered AI explanations

Model Interpretation and Explainability: Towards Creating Transparency in Prediction Models

Generating Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Transformers in Financial Text Classification

Fool Me Once? Contrasting Textual and Visual Explanations in a Clinical Decision-Support Setting

AI is not careful: approach to the stock market and preference for AI advisor

Fairness and Explanation in AI-Informed Decision Making