Efficacy and safety of apatinib in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pilot study

Luo Huang,Xin Zhang,Yu Bai,Kevin L M Chua,Yue Xie,Xiaolei Shu,Bin Long,Chunbo Fan,Darren W T Lim,Sze Huey Tan,Joseph T S Wee,Ying Wang,Yongzhong Wu,Melvin L K Chua,Kevin L.M. Chua,Darren W.T. Lim,Joseph T.S. Wee,Melvin L.K. Chua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105222
IF: 5.972
2021-04-01
Oral Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>There is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Thirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0–8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9–49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7–87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1–5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5–8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of &lt;700 (range: 353–622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428–7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, <em>P</em> = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Our data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.</p>
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?