Abstract:BackgroundDespite the overall effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a subset of patients do not experience expected improvements in pain, physical function, and quality of life as documented by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which assess a patient’s physical and emotional health and pain. It is therefore important to develop preoperative tools capable of identifying patients unlikely to improve by a clinically important margin after surgery.Questions/purposesThe purpose of this study was to determine if an association exists between preoperative PROM scores and patients’ likelihood of experiencing a clinically meaningful change in function 1 year after TKA.MethodsA retrospective study design was used to evaluate preoperative and 1-year postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and SF-12 version 2 (SF12v2) scores from 562 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA. This cohort represented 75% of the 750 patients who underwent surgery during that time period; a total of 188 others (25%) either did not complete PROM scores at the designated times or were lost to follow-up. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were calculated for each PROM using a distribution-based method and were used to define meaningful clinical improvement. MCID values for KOOS and SF12v2 physical component summary (PCS) scores were calculated to be 10 and 5, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine threshold values for preoperative KOOS and SF12v2 PCS scores and their respective predictive abilities. Threshold values defined the point after which the likelihood of clinically meaningful improvement began to diminish. Multivariate regression was used to control for the effect of preoperative mental and emotional health, patient attributes quantified by SF12v2 mental component summary (MCS) scores, on patients’ likelihood of experiencing meaningful improvement in function after surgery.ResultsThreshold values for preoperative KOOS and SF12v2 PCS scores were a maximum of 58 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.76; p < 0.001) and 34 (AUC, 0.65; p < 0.001), respectively. Patients scoring above these thresholds, indicating better preoperative function, were less likely to experience a clinically meaningful improvement in function after TKA. When accounting for mental and emotional health with a multivariate analysis, the predictive ability of both KOOS and SF12v2 PCS threshold values improved (AUCs increased to 0.80 and 0.71, respectively). Better preoperative mental and emotional health, as reflected by a higher MCS score, resulted in higher threshold values for KOOS and SF12v2 PCS.ConclusionsWe identified preoperative PROM threshold values that are associated with clinically meaningful improvements in functional outcome after TKA. Patients with preoperative KOOS or SF12v2 PCS scores above the defined threshold values have a diminishing probability of experiencing clinically meaningful improvement after TKA. Patients with worse baseline mental and emotional health (as defined by SF12v2 MCS score) have a lower probability of experiencing clinically important levels of functional improvement after surgery. The results of this study are directly applicable to patient-centered informed decision-making tools and may be used to facilitate discussions with patients regarding the expected benefit after TKA.Level of EvidenceLevel III, prognostic study.

Using two predictive models captures two types of poor outcomes in knee arthroplasty: A multisite longitudinal cohort study

A Systematic Approach to Predicting the Risk of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

National UK audit of procedure for prolapsing haemorrhoids on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

Multimodal prediction of pain and functional outcomes 6 months following total knee replacement: a prospective cohort study

Applying models of care for total hip and knee arthroplasty: External validation of a published predictive model to identify extended stay risk prior to lower-limb arthroplasty

The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty

Surgical factors play a critical role in predicting functional outcomes using machine learning in robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty

Predicting Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty by Cluster Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Time-Dependent Prediction Models for Individual Prognosis of Chronic Postsurgical Pain Following Knee Replacement Based on an Extensive Multivariable Data Set

Strengthening Quality Measurement to Predict Success for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Development of machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of minimal clinically important difference for the KOOS‐PS following total knee arthroplasty

Prediction of Early Adverse Events After THA: A Comparison of Different Machine-Learning Strategies Based on 262,356 Observations From the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) Dataset

PROMIS cluster analysis predicts two-year outcomes in knee surgery patients

Development and Validation of Prediction Models for the Risk of Knee Replacement Using Data from Multi-Center Cohort Studies

[Acute abdomen due to a strangulated and perforated para-esophageal hernia. A case report].

Selection and Scheduling Problem in Continuous Time with Pairwise-Interdependencies

Can individual functional improvements be predicted in osteoarthritic patients after total knee arthroplasty?

Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA?

Identifying who are unlikely to benefit from total knee arthroplasty using machine learning models

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF PREDICTION MODELS FOR THE RISK OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT USING DATA FROM MULTI-CENTER COHORT STUDIES

Predictive analysis of economic and clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: Identifying high‐risk patients for increased costs and length of stay