Application of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in gastric cancer

Yeyang Chen,Siyu Liu,Bopei Li,Rujing Lin,Weikun Lai,Dejun Liu,Zhen Wang,Jinlu Liu,Xingan Qin,Xianghua Wu,Jiehua Li,Kui Jia,Junqiang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01719-w
2024-01-22
Updates in Surgery
Abstract:Patient reported outcomes is currently considered to be an important supplement to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical practice. The Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40) is one of the most frequently used and validation tool to assess the subjective feelings of quality of life after surgery. The present study aimed to use the QoR-40 to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in gastric cancer from the perspective of patient-reported quality of recovery. The study was designed as a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial, conducted in a single center. Patients in our hospital who were scheduled to undergo radical surgery for gastric cancer were divided into ERAS group and control group (Contr group). The QoR-40 were administered one day before surgery (Baseline) and on postoperative day 1, 3, 6, and 30. The difference in QoR-40 scores between the ERAS and Contr groups was compared by repeated-measures ANOVA. A total of 200 patients completed the study, including 100 patients in the ERAS group and 100 patients in the Contr group. The Baseline time point QoR-40 scores of the ERAS and Contr groups were 179.68 ± 14.46 and 180.12 ± 17.12, respectively, and no significant difference was noted between the two groups (p = 0.845). The postoperative QoR-40 score of the ERAS group was significantly higher than that of the Contr group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). This study demonstrated that, in terms of patient-reported quality of recovery, the postoperative recovery effect of ERAS protocols in gastric cancer is significantly better than that of the traditional treatment model.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily explores the application effects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastric cancer surgery, particularly evaluating the quality of postoperative recovery from the perspective of patients' subjective experiences. ### Research Background and Objectives - **Background**: Globally, gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignant tumor and the fourth leading cause of cancer death. Although surgery is one of the main treatments for gastric cancer, optimizing perioperative management to reduce trauma, shorten hospital stays, and lower hospitalization costs remains a key research focus. - **Objective**: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the ERAS protocol in gastric cancer surgery using the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40), assessing from the perspective of patient-reported recovery quality. ### Research Design - **Design Type**: Prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. - **Participants**: 200 patients scheduled for radical gastric cancer surgery were divided into the ERAS group and the control group, with 100 patients in each group. - **Main Tool**: The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess patients on the day before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 3, 6, and 30. - **Statistical Analysis**: Repeated measures ANOVA and other statistical methods were used to compare differences between the two groups. ### Main Findings - **Baseline Data**: At the preoperative baseline, there was no significant difference in QoR-40 scores between the ERAS group and the control group. - **Postoperative Recovery**: At different postoperative time points, the QoR-40 scores of the ERAS group were significantly higher than those of the control group, indicating better postoperative recovery quality in the ERAS group. - **Other Results**: - The time to first flatus, time to ambulation, and time to start diet were all earlier in the ERAS group compared to the control group. - The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group. - Hospitalization costs were lower in the ERAS group compared to the control group. ### Conclusion Based on patient-reported outcomes, the ERAS protocol significantly improves recovery quality after gastric cancer surgery compared to traditional treatment methods, enhancing patients' quality of life, promoting faster recovery, and being cost-effective.