Abstract:The major barriers for applying carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technology to coal-fired power plants in China and worldwide are the consequent drop in power plant energy efficiency and significantly higher cost of electricity (COE). This paper proposes a new perspective for determining the most cost-efficient CO2 capture ratio using a modeling and simulation approach that balances the per unit parasitic energy consumption for absorbent regeneration with the per unit capital cost of the CO2 capture unit of a coal-fired power plant. Using a typical 550 MW supercritical pulverized coal-fired power plant in China as the reference plant, with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption unit for CO2 capture, a process model of the power generation unit together with the MEA CO2 capture unit was developed and detailed process simulations were conducted with the model. Then, a sensitivity analysis was then conducted to study the impact on key plant behavior indicators, including per unit energy penalty for absorbent regeneration, net power output and power generation efficiency, total capital cost of the power plant together with the MEA CO2 absorption unit, per unit capital cost of the MEA unit, COE, as well as the per unit CO2 avoidance cost (indicated by cost per tonne (t) CO2 avoided), across a CO2 capture ratio range between 20% and 99%. The results show that when CO2 capture ratio is low, while the unit energy consumption for absorbent regeneration per tCO2 avoided increases steadily with the increase of CO2 capture ratio, the cost per tCO2 avoided decreases as the MEA absorption train is scaled up given the high capital cost of each MEA train. After CO2 capture ratio reaches certain level (60% for this plant), the cost per tCO2 avoided starts to increase with CO2 capture ratio, since the unit energy consum- - ption for absorbent regeneration per tCO2 avoided has increased to so high that it supplants the scaling effect of the MEA train and becomes the dominant factor that determines the increase or decrease trend of the cost per tCO2 avoided. Besides, due to the physical restraint on the upper bound of CO2 capture capability of one single MEA train by the diameter of the absorber, an additional MEA train is needed when the CO2 capture ratio increases to certain points (40% and 85% for this plant), resulting in jumps of several parameters including the total capital cost for the power plant and MEA CO2 capture unit, per unit capital cost for the MEA CO2 capture unit, and last the cost per tCO2 avoided. Based on all these result, finally a cost-optimal CO2 capture ratio of 40% (365 RMB/tCO2-_avoided) was obtained, which is easier for the power plant to bear while realizing a significant reduction in CO2 emission of this plant. Therefore, applying this approach for determining CO2 capture ratios could help minimize the barrier for the initiation of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) in China's power industry. Besides, future replacement or improvement for the MEA CO2 capture technology has the potential to further reduce the cost per tCO2 avoided, which needs special attention.

China’s coal power decarbonization via CO 2 capture and storage and biomass co-firing: A LCA case study in Inner Mongolia

Trade-off between carbon reduction benefits and ecological costs of biomass-based power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China

Lifecycle Analysis of Coal-Fired Power Plants with Ccs in China

Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review

Techno-economic Evaluation of CO2 Capture and Storage Retrofit in Decarbonizing Different Thermal Power Plants: A Case Study in China

Co-firing Plants with Retrofitted Carbon Capture and Storage for Power-Sector Emissions Mitigation

Techno-economic evaluation of CO 2 capture and storage retrofit in decarbonizing different thermal power plants: A case study in China

Life Cycle Carbon Emission Assessment for a Coal-fired Power Plant Using MEA CO2 Capture and Storage Technology

Gasification of coal and biomass as a net carbon-negative power source for environment-friendly electricity generation in China

External Performance of Biomass Power Generation in China Based on Life Cycle Analysis

Coal Power Decarbonization Via Biomass Co-Firing with Carbon Capture and Storage: Tradeoff Between Exergy Loss and GHG Reduction

Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Biomass Co-Firing Power Plants with CO2 Capture and Storage Considering Multiple Incentives

Role for Carbon Capture and Storage in China

Reducing initial barriers for CCS deployment on pulverized coal-fired power plants in China by optimizing the capture ratio of carbon dioxide

Multi-scope Decarbonization and Environmental Impacts Evaluation for Biomass Fuels Co-Firing CHP Units in China

Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage

Spatially explicit analysis identifies significant potential for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in China

Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Generation and Its Alternatives

Integrated Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Mitigation Through Energy Efficiency for Coal-Fired Power Industry in China

CO2 Mitigation Potential of CCS in China – an Evaluation Based on an Integrated Assessment Model

Up-to-date life cycle assessment and comparison study of clean coal power generation technologies in China