Abstract:Abstract The embodied cognition hypothesis postulates that human cognition is fundamentally grounded in our experience of interacting with the physical world (Barsalou in Behav Brain Sci 22:577–609, 1999). Research has shown bi-directional associations between physical action and the processes of understanding language: language comprehension seems to activate implied visual and motor components (Zwaan and Taylor in J Exp Psychol Gen 135(1):1–11, 2006), and action behavior seems to facilitate the comprehension of associated action-language (Beilock et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13269–13273, 2008). Although numerous research studies have reported a link between action and language comprehension, the exact nature of their association remains subject to debate (Chatterjee in Lang Cognit 2:79–116, 2010). Moreover, the role of action in the production of language is under-explored, as are general language production processes in Austronesian languages. The endangered Austronesian language Truku provides typological patterns that are both under-examined in psycholinguistic research and informative for questions of language production. Truku allows flexibility in the relative location of verbs versus arguments in sentence production, and uses a symmetrical voice system that marks the prominence of different participants in an event. Working with native speakers of Truku, we tested whether performing physical motions immediately affects the conceptual saliency of the components represented in a to-be-described event in ways that guide speakers’ visual attention and shape their utterance formulation. More specifically, we investigated whether speakers’ engagement as an agent or patient in a non-speech physical action affects initial eye-fixations on agent versus patient participants in a visual scene, as well as word order and grammatical voice choices in the speakers’ descriptions of simple transitive events. The results revealed significant effects of physical action on the relative location and prominence of agents in subsequent sentence formulation, and on online patterns of eye fixations. These results provide further support for language-action connections in cognitive processing, and shed light on the cross-linguistic patterns of sentence production.

Direction and velocity kinematic features of point-light displays grasping actions are differentially coded within the action observation network

Configuration of the action observation network depends on the goals of the observer

Pointing Accurately at a Target Doesn't Require Perceiving Its Location Accurately

Action observation effects reflect the modular organization of the human motor system

Two distinct networks for encoding goals and forms of action: An effective connectivity study

Top-Down Modulation of Visual Action Perception: Distinct Task Effects in the Action Observation Network

Decoding grip type and action goal during the observation of reaching-grasping actions: A multivariate fMRI study

Decoding the physics of observed actions in the human brain

Effective Connectivity Analysis and Classification of Action Observation From Different Perspectives: An fMRI Study

Progressively shifting patterns of co-modulation among premotor cortex neurons carry dynamically similar signals during action execution and observation

Action observation network: domain-specific or domain-general?

Neural Activity and Decoding of Action Observation Using Combined EEG and fNIRS Measurement

Parieto-Frontal Circuits During Observation of Hidden and Visible Motor Acts in Children. A High-density EEG Source Imaging Study

Agentive versus non-agentive motions immediately influence event apprehension and description: an eye-tracking study in a VOS language

Investigating Effective Brain Networks of Action Observation Tasks from Different Visual Perspectives Based on Generalized Partial Directed Coherence: an Fmri Study

Neural Encoding of Direction and Distance across Reference Frames in Visually Guided Reaching

Communicative interactions in point-light displays: Choosing among multiple response alternatives

The capacity of action observation to drag the trainees' motor pattern toward the observed model

Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot

The visual encoding of tool–object affordances

Distinct neural mechanisms for action access and execution in the human brain: insights from an fMRI study