Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Evaluating the Distributive Incidence of Growth Using Cross‐sections and Panels

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Measures of Relative and Absolute Convergence and Pro‐poor Growth with an Illustration based on China (2010–2018)

The Two Growth Rates of the Economy

Moving up and moving down: a new way of examining country growth dynamics

Modeling the evolution of Gini coefficient for personal incomes in the USA between 1947 and 2005

The three I's of downward income mobility: A directional subgroup decomposable measure

What's behind pro-poor growth? An investigation of its drivers and dynamics

Uncovering Gatsby Curves

Poverty, Pro-Poor Growth and Mobility

Pareto's Limits: Improving Inequality Estimates in America, 1917 to 1965

Top-end inequality and growth: empirical exploration of nonlinearities and the time dimension

Income Inequality and Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States

Long-run trends in top income shares: The role of income and population growth

A Schumpeterian exploration of Gini and top/bottom income shares

A Varying Coefficient Model for Assessing the Returns to Growth to Account for Poverty and Inequality

Investigating Growth-at-Risk Using a Multicountry Nonparametric Quantile Factor Model

Is the Intergenerational Income Elasticity a Sufficient Statistic for Fairness?

Measuring Absolute Income Mobility: Lessons from North America and Europe

Discussion paper. Conditional growth charts

Statistical Dynamics of Wealth Inequality in Stochastic Models of Growth