Abstract:Main text The objective of the Supplementary Comparison (SC) SIM.M.FF-S9 for water flow measurement was to support and prove the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) of the participating NMIs of Chile (CISA), Peru (INACAL), Bolivia (IBMETRO) and Argentina (INTI). As pilot laboratories, the national metrology institutes of Germany (PTB) and CENAM (Mexico) supported the comparison with reference values. The comparison was organized as a single round robin, started in January 2016 at PTB and finished in August 2019, also at PTB. A combined setup of a turbine meter and Coriolis meter was used as a transfer standard. The nominal calibration conditions of the SC were defined in the flow range between 10 m 3 /h and 130 m 3 /h, 20 °C fluid temperature and 0.3 MPa line pressure. In order to estimate the uncertainties u TS , both transfer meters were subjected to extensive characterization measurements at pilot laboratory PTB. The following parameters were researched in detail: fluid temperature, line pressure, reproducibility, flow stability and meter sensitivity to different inflow conditions. The E N values for the turbine meter were calculated based on PTB data, only. The E N values for the Coriolis meter are partly linked to Key Comparison CCM.FF-K1.2015 and were calculated using a common reference value of PTB and CENAM data. The uncertainty of turbine meter u TS was clearly dominated by the sensitivity to disturbed inflow conditions which leads to large values of u TS with > 0.20 %. Beside one calibration, all labs passed the E N criteria of ≤ 1.20. But, due to large values of u TS , the calibrations for all labs were evaluated as inconclusive. The evaluation criteria u comp /u base exceeded the critical value of 2.00 for all calibrations. Finally, the turbine meter was not suitable for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values. The calibration results of the Coriolis meter were characterized by a strong dependency on zero setting. The observed effect was adjusted for the data of both reference laboratories by introducing a new method for autozero correction. Maximum uncertainty values for Coriolis u TS were estimated with 0.069 % at low flowrates and 0.033 % at high flowrates. Besides two calibrations, all laboratories complied with the E N criteria of ≤ 1.20. In contrast to turbine meter, the evaluation criteria u comp /u base exceeded the critical value of 2.00 at one calibration, only. In consequence, the calibrations by using the Coriolis meter were suitable for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values. In summary, the comparison was successfully finished for a confirmation of the submitted CMC values, related to mass calibrations. For volume related CMCs this comparison was not suitable. The comparison was partially financially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) - PNs: 2012.2296.7-95259, 2015.2037.8-95306 and 2017.2073.9-95328. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Comparison of liquid density measurements among SIM NMIs - SIM.M.D-S7

Final report on EURAMET key comparison EURAMET.M.D-K2.2 (1523)

Final report on EURAMET key comparison EURAMET.M.D-K2.1 (1522)

Supplementary comparison SIM.M.FF-S9.2016 for water flow measurement

EURAMET Key Comparison EURAMET.M.D-K4.2020: Hydrometer Calibration Comparison from 600 Kg/m3 to 2000 Kg/m3

Final report on supplementary comparison of national standards in the field of flow and mass of liquid within the flow range of 0.1 t/h to 45 t/h

Final report for SIM.QM-S12: supplementary comparison for trace elements in natural water

Comparisons of standards for liquid flow rates under static load changes

Development and Stability Verification of a Measuring Installation of Saturation Liquid Density

Report on EURAMET supplementary comparison on measurement of a 1 mm stage micrometer

SIM.T-K9.3: Standard platinum resistance thermometer ITS-90 realizations from the Hg triple point to the Zn freezing point

Supplementary comparison of national measurement standards of gauge pressure in the range from 1 MPa to 10 MPa

CCM.G-K2.2023: CIPM key comparison of absolute gravimeters

Absolute Measurement of the Density of Silicon Spheres to Improve the Primary Density Standard of NMIJ

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NMC-A*STAR, July 2022

SIM Thermocouple Type S Supplementary Comparison

Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators

Comparison report of the ITS-90 realization at the freezing point of silver between NIM and CMS

Supplementary comparison on a platinum resistance thermometer calibration from -70 °C to 250 °C

P–ρ–T Measurements for 1-Alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids with Tetrafluoroborate and a Trifluoromethanesulfonate Anion

CCQM-K173.1 - Assay of sodium carbonate. Final report