Cancer patients have a reduced likelihood of dying in hospital with advance care planning in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan: a prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial

Bardo Driller,Bente Talseth-Palmer,Torstein Hole,Kjell Erik Strømskag,Anne-Tove Brenne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2346131

2024-04-27

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Abstract:Background Advance care planning (ACP) allows patients to define their goals and preferences. Spending more time at home and less time in the hospital, along with avoiding death in the hospital, are often considered desirable outcomes of palliative care (PC). In 2015, 36% of cancer patients died in the hospital and 13% died at home in Norway.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services,primary health care

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to study the impact of organized advance care planning (ACP) conversations and summarized palliative plans in a primary healthcare setting on the time cancer patients spend at home and their place of death.

### Research Background
- **Purpose of ACP**: ACP allows patients to define their goals and preferences, often including more time at home rather than in the hospital, and avoiding dying in the hospital.
- **Current Situation**: In 2015, in Norway, 36% of cancer patients died in hospitals, while 13% died at home.

### Research Methods
- **Study Design**: Prospective, controlled, non-randomized intervention trial.
- **Study Subjects**: Between 2015 and 2022, 144 cancer patients were observed, some of whom had organized ACP conversations and summarized palliative plans (intervention group), while others did not (control group).
- **Data Collection**: Longitudinal data were collected through paper medical record forms, and additional information was extracted from electronic medical records.

### Main Results
- **Primary Outcome**: There was no significant difference in the time spent at home within the last 90 days of life between the two groups.
- **Secondary Outcomes**:
- In the intervention group, the proportion of patients dying in a primary healthcare setting (home or nursing home) was significantly higher than in the control group (82.2% vs. 65.6%, p = 0.033).
- The proportion of patients dying in hospitals was higher in the control group.
- There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients dying at home between the two groups.
- Patients in the intervention group were more likely to receive home visits from general practitioners (p < 0.001).

### Conclusion
- Organized ACP conversations and summarized palliative plans in a primary healthcare setting significantly reduce the likelihood of cancer patients dying in hospitals.
- A structured ACP approach can support patients' preferences at the end of their lives.