Abstract:[1] When conducting model averaging for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty, the averaging weights are often evaluated using model selection criteria such as AIC, AICc, BIC, and KIC (Akaike Information Criterion, Corrected Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, and Kashyap Information Criterion, respectively). However, this method often leads to an unrealistic situation in which the best model receives overwhelmingly large averaging weight (close to 100%), which cannot be justified by available data and knowledge. It was found in this study that this problem was caused by using the covariance matrix, C-epsilon, of measurement errors for estimating the negative log likelihood function common to all the model selection criteria. This problem can be resolved by using the covariance matrix, Cek, of total errors (including model errors and measurement errors) to account for the correlation between the total errors. An iterative two-stage method was developed in the context of maximum likelihood inverse modeling to iteratively infer the unknown Cek from the residuals during model calibration. The inferred Cek was then used in the evaluation of model selection criteria and model averaging weights. While this method was limited to serial data using time series techniques in this study, it can be extended to spatial data using geostatistical techniques. The method was first evaluated in a synthetic study and then applied to an experimental study, in which alternative surface complexation models were developed to simulate column experiments of uranium reactive transport. It was found that the total errors of the alternative models were temporally correlated due to the model errors. The iterative two-stage method using Cek resolved the problem that the best model receives 100% model averaging weight, and the resulting model averaging weights were supported by the calibration results and physical understanding of the alternative models. Using Cek obtained from the iterative two-stage method also improved predictive performance of the individual models and model averaging in both synthetic and experimental studies.

Model averaging for right censored data with measurement error

Optimal model averaging for partially linear models with missing response variables and error‐prone covariates

Model Averaging for Accelerated Failure Time Models with Missing Censoring Indicators

Optimal Model Averaging for Semiparametric Partially Linear Models with Measurement Errors

Model Averaging Estimation for Nonparametric Varying-Coefficient Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity

Optimal Model Averaging for Semiparametric Partially Linear Models with Censored Data

Model Averaging with Averaging Covariance Matrix

A Mallows-type Model Averaging Estimator for Ridge Regression with Randomly Right Censored Data

A Mallows-type Model Averaging Estimator for De-Noise Linear Models

Model Averaging for Estimating Treatment Effects With Binary Responses

FIC Based Model Averaging for the Censored Quantile Varying Coefficient Regression Model

Penalized Time-Varying Model Averaging

Model Averaging for Generalized Linear Model with Covariates that are Missing completely at Random

Model Selection and Model Averaging for Semiparametric Partially Linear Models with Missing Data

Least Squares Model Averaging by Mallows Criterion

Effects of error covariance structure on estimation of model averaging weights and predictive performance

MODEL AVERAGING BASED ON KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISTANCE.

On Asymptotic Optimality of Least Squares Model Averaging When True Model Is Included

Spatial Mallows Model Averaging for Geostatistical Models

Model averaging in a multiplicative heteroscedastic model

Model Averaging for Semiparametric Varying Coefficient Quantile Regression Models