Effect of geography on the use of ultrafiltration during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
Kirti P Patel,Alfred H Stammers,Eric A Tesdahl,Jeffrey Chores,Scott R Beckmann,Jennifer Baeza,Craig M Petterson,Ty Thompson,Alexander Baginski,Michael Firstenberg,Jeffrey P Jacobs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241246080
2024-04-24
Perfusion
Abstract:Perfusion, Ahead of Print. BackgroundUltrafiltration (UF) is a common practice during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) where it is used as a blood management strategy to reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, minimize adverse effects of hemodilution, and reduce proinflammatory mediators. However, its clinical utilization has been shown to vary throughout the continents.PurposeThe purpose of this investigation was to assess the distribution of UF use across the United States.Data CollectionData on UF use during cardiac surgery was obtained from a national (United States) perfusion database for adult cardiac procedures performed from January 2016 through December 2018.Study SampleFour geographical regions were established: Northeast (NE), South (SO), Midwest (MW) and West (WE). The primary endpoint was the use of UF with secondary endpoints UF volume, CPB and anesthesia asanguineous volumes, intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion, nadir hematocrit and urine output (UO). 92,859 adult cardiac cases from 191 hospitals were reviewed.ResultsThe NE and the WE had similar usages of UF (59.9% and 59.7% respectively), which were higher than the MW and the SO (38.6% and 34.9%, p < .001). When UF was utilized, the median [IQR] volume removed was highest in the NE (1900 [1200-2800]mL), and similar in all other regions (WE 1500 [850-2400 mL, MW 1500 [900-2300]mL and SO 1500 [950-2200]mL, p < .001. Median total UO was lowest in the NE 400 [210,650]mL vs all other regions (p < .001), and remained so when indexed by patient weight and operative time (NE-0.8 [0.5, 1.3]mL/kg/hour, MW-1.1 [0.7, 1.8] mL/kg/hour, SO-1.3 [0.8, 2.0]mL/kg/hour, WE-1.1 [0.7, 1.3]mL/kg/hour, p < .001. Intraoperative RBC transfusion rate was highest in the SO (21.3%) and WE (20.5%), while similar rates seen in the NE (16.2%) and MW (17.6%), p < .001.ConclusionsAcross the United States there is geographic variation on the use of UF. Further research is warranted to investigate why these practice variations exist and to better understand and determine their reasons for use.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease