Do Plastic Warning Labels Reduce Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Plastic Packaging?

Joanna Van Asselt, Yefan Nian, Moonwon Soh, Zhifeng Gao, Stephen N Morgan
2020-01-01
Abstract:Plastic, unlike other packaging materials has been found to pose threats to human, animal and ecosystem health. At the same time, however, plastic generation in the United States has increased by more than 700 percent since the 1990s. Further, plastic recycling rates in the United States are low. Plastic that is not recycled is mainly landfilled or escapes directly into environment, negatively impacting the health of our ecosystems. While some states and municipalities in the United States (US) have begun to address the proliferation of plastic waste, either through implementing fees or deposit refund systems, other states have made it illegal to put in place policies that reduce plastic consumption. Given this environment, one idea that could help reduce plastic use in the US would be to place warning labels on plastic packaging. In this paper, we use a choice experiment to test whether putting warning labels on plastic packaging reduces consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for plastic packaging. Further, we test three labels that warn against the negative impacts of plastic on health, environment, and safety. Finally, we check whether knowledge of recycling as well as attitude to the environment and own health impacts willingness to pay for plastic. A mixed logit estimation reveals that warning labels do reduce consumers’ willingness to pay for plastic, but label type has a huge impact on reduction. While all three warning labels reduced willingness to pay for plastic, the environment label had a smaller effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?