Population pharmacokinetic model of ABL001/CTX‐009 (anti‐VEGF/DLL4) in adult cancer patients with solid tumor

Joo Young Na,Juyeun Jeon,Ki Young Huh,Kyung‐Sang Yu,Sangmi Lee,Jaehyun Eom,Jinhyung Ahn,Weon‐Kyoo You,Jaeseong Oh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.16363
IF: 5.7
2024-10-09
Cancer Science
Abstract:This study developed a population pharmacokinetic model that adequately describes the pharmacokinetic property of ABL001/CTX‐009 in patients with solid tumors and presented a rationale for fixed dosing instead of weight‐based dosing at different dosing intervals. Based on the simulation results from this study, different dosing regimens can be applied to patients receiving ABL001/CTX‐009 in further clinical trials. ABL001/CTX‐009 is a bispecific antibody targeting delta‐like ligand‐4 and vascular endothelial growth factor A. In this study, we developed a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of ABL001/CTX‐009 in patients with solid tumors. A total of 712 plasma concentrations from 30 patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors were collected from a phase 1 study (NCT03292783). A population PK model was developed using a nonlinear mixed‐effect method and was evaluated by graphical and numerical methods. Using the model, the steady‐state concentrations were simulated to compare weight‐based and fixed‐dose regimens and to find optimal dosing intervals. The PK of ABL001/CTX‐009 was well described by a two‐compartment model with a parallel first‐order and Michaelis–Menten elimination kinetics. Body weight was selected as a significant covariate on V1. Model evaluation results suggested that the model was adequate and robust with good precision. Simulations after administrations of fixed or weight‐based doses showed similar plasma concentrations. Additionally, 10 mg/kg for every other week and 15 mg/kg for every three‐week administration showed comparable plasma concentrations. In conclusion, the model well described the plasma concentrations of ABL001/CTX‐009 in patients with solid tumors. The simulation suggested that weight‐based dose and fixed dose can provide equivalent systemic exposure.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?