Abstract:BACKGROUND: Polytomous logistic regression models are commonly used in case-control studies of cancer to directly compare the risks associated with an exposure variable across multiple cancer subtypes. However, the validity, accuracy, and efficiency of this approach for prospective cohort studies have not been formally evaluated.METHODS: We investigated the performance of the polytomous logistic regression model and compared it with an alternative approach based on a joint Cox proportional hazards model using simulation studies. We then applied both methods to a prospective cohort study to assess whether the association of breast cancer with body size differs according to estrogen and progesterone receptor-defined subtypes.RESULTS: Our simulations showed that the polytomous logistic regression model but not the joint Cox regression model yielded biased results in comparing exposure and disease subtype associations when the baseline hazards for different disease subtypes are nonproportional. For this reason, an analysis of a real data set was based on the joint Cox proportional hazards model and showed that body size has a significantly greater association with estrogen- and progesterone-positive breast cancer than with other subtypes.CONCLUSIONS: Because of the limitations of the polytomous logistic regression model for the comparison of exposure-disease associations across disease subtypes, the joint Cox proportional hazards model is recommended over the polytomous logistic regression model in prospective cohort studies.IMPACT: The article will promote the use of the joint Cox model in a prospective cohort study. Examples of SAS and S-plus programming codes are provided to facilitate use by nonstatisticians.

Hybrid copula mixed models for combining case-control and cohort studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic tests

An one-factor copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests

A multinomial quadrivariate D-vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies in the presence of non-evaluable subjects

A copula-based set-variant association test for bivariate continuous or mixed phenotypes

Joint meta-analysis of two diagnostic tests accounting for within and between studies dependence

An extended trivariate vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies in the presence of non-evaluable outcomes

Use of copula to model within-study association in bivariate meta-analysis of binomial data at the aggregate level a Bayesian approach and application to surrogate endpoint evaluation

Hybrid Design Evaluating New Biomarkers when There is an Existing Screening Test

A multiple testing framework for diagnostic accuracy studies with co-primary endpoints

A joint model of cancer incidence, metastasis, and mortality

Nonparametric covariate hypothesis tests for the cure rate in mixture cure models

A hybrid omnibus test for generalized semiparametric single‐index models with high‐dimensional covariate sets

Evaluating hybrid controls methodology in early-phase oncology trials: a simulation study based on the MORPHEUS-UC trial

Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies

Construction and evaluation of optimal diagnostic tests with application to hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis

A discrete time-to-event model for the meta-analysis of full ROC curves

Combining Cox Regressions Across a Heterogeneous Distributed Research Network Facing Small and Zero Counts

Testing for Publication Bias in Diagnostic Meta-Analysis: A Simulation Study

A Comparison of the Polytomous Logistic Regression and Joint Cox Proportional Hazards Models for Evaluating Multiple Disease Subtypes in Prospective Cohort Studies

Combining Survival Trials Using Aggregate Data Based on Misspecified Models

Combining Biomarkers to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Detecting Diseases With Group‐Tested Data