Targeted Proteomics and Metabolomics for Biomarker Discovery in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Post-EVAR Sac Volume

Alexander Vanmaele,Elke Bouwens,Sanne E Hoeks,Alida Kindt,Lieke Lamont,Bram Fioole,Adriaan Moelker,Sander ten Raa,Burhan Hussain,José Oliveira-Pinto,Arne S Ijpma,Felix van Lier,K. Martijn Akkerhuis,Danielle F Majoor-Krakauer,Thomas Hankemeier,Yolanda de Rijke,Hence JM Verhagen,Eric Boersma,Isabella Kardys
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.117786
IF: 6.314
2024-01-21
Clinica Chimica Acta
Abstract:Background and aims Abdominal aortic aneurysm(AAA) patients undergo uniform surveillance programs both leading up to, and following surgery. Circulating biomarkers could play a pivotal role in individualizing surveillance. We applied a multi-omics approach to identify relevant biomarkers and gain pathophysiological insights. Materials and methods In this cross-sectional study, 108 AAA patients and 200 post-endovascular aneurysm repair(post-EVAR) patients were separately investigated. We performed partial least squares regression and ingenuity pathway analysis on circulating concentrations of 96 proteins(92 Olink Cardiovascular-III panel, 4 ELISA-assays) and 199 metabolites(measured by LC-TQMS), and their associations with CT-based AAA/sac volume. Results The median(25 th -75 th percentile) maximal diameter was 50.0mm(46.0,53.0) in the AAA group, and 55.4mm(45.0,64.2) in the post-EVAR group. Correcting for clinical characteristics in AAA patients, the aneurysm volume Z-score differed 0.068(95%CI:(0.042,0.093)), 0.066(0.047,0.085) and -0.051(-0.064,-0.038) per Z-score valine, leucine and uPA, respectively. After correcting for clinical characteristics and orthogonalization in the post-EVAR group, the sac volume Z-score differed 0.049(0.034,0.063) per Z-score TIMP-4, -0.050(-0.064,-0.037) per Z-score LDL-receptor, -0.051(-0.062,-0.040) per Z-score 1-OG/2-OG and -0.056(-0.066,-0.045) per Z-score 1-LG/2-LG. Conclusions The branched-chain amino acids and uPA were related to AAA volume. For post-EVAR patients, LDL-receptor, monoacylglycerols and TIMP-4 are potential biomarkers for sac volume. Additionally, distinct markers for sac change were identified.
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?