Abstract:Although fluency theory predominates psychological research on human aesthetics, its most severe limitation may be to explain why art that challenges or even violates easy processing can nevertheless be aesthetically rewarding. We discuss long-standing notions on art's potential to offer mental growth opportunities and to tap into a basic epistemic predisposition that hint at a fluency counteracting aesthetic pleasure mechanism. Based on divergent strands of literature on empirical, evolutionary, and philosophical aesthetics, as well as research on disfluency, we presumed that challenging art requires deliberate reflexive processing at the level of "aboutness" in order to be experientially pleasing. Here, we probed such a cognitive mastering mechanism, achieved by iterative cycles of elaboration, as predicted by our model of aesthetic experiences. For the study, two kinds of portraits were applied, one associable to a high fluency and one to a high stimulation potential (according to results of an extensive rating study). In Experiment 1, we provided a repeated evaluation task, which revealed a distinctive preference effect for challenging portraits that was absent in the visual exposition conditions of a familiarity and a mere exposure task (Experiment 2). In a follow-up task (Experiment 3) this preference effect was observed with a novel and more encompassing pool of portraits, which corroborated its stability and robustness. In an explorative stimulus-transfer task (Experiment 4), we investigated the presumed underlying mechanism by testing whether the observed effect would generalize onto novel portraits of the same artist-specific styles. Results discounted an alternative interpretation of a perceptual adaptation effect and hinted at meaning-driven mental activity. Conjointly, findings for inexperienced viewers were indicative of an elaboration based mastering mechanism that selectively operated for mentally challenging portraits. Moreover, findings were in line with a dual-process view of human preference formation with art. Theoretical implications and boundary conditions are discussed.

Selective Engagement with Specific Invariants in the Perception of Art

Art, Artists, and Perception: A Model for Premotor Contributions to Perceptual Analysis and Form Recognition

Sensory Processing of Art as a Unique Window into Cognitive Mechanisms: Evidence from Behavioral Experiments and fMRI Studies

Hearing How Smooth It Looks: Selective Attention and Crossmodal Perception in the Arts

Art and Perception: Using Empirical Aesthetics in Research on Consciousness

How the intentions of the draftsman shape perception of a drawing

An artistic exploration of inattention blindness

“Making Sense” of Art through Design: Towards a Multisensory Theory of Reception Aesthetics

Understand after Like, Viewer'S Delight? A Fnirs Study of Order-Effect in Combined Hedonic and Cognitive Appraisal of Art

Order and change in art: towards an active inference account of aesthetic experience

Aesthetics and the Limits of the Extended Mind

Perceiving What Paintings Express

Aristotle's dream: Evolutionary and neural aspects of aesthetic communication in the arts

Attention, consciousness, and the semantics of questions

When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits

Cognitive capacity and aesthetics: the influence of visual working memory on landscape ink painting preference

Complementarity As Generative Principle: A Thought Pattern for Aesthetic Appreciations and Cognitive Appraisals in General

Aesthetic appreciation is more than seeing, and symbolicity is more than discriminating: a comment on Tylén et al. (2020)

Predicting instabilities: an embodied perspective on unstable experiences with art and design

The Enactive and Interactive Dimensions of AI: Ingenuity and Imagination Through the Lens of Art and Music

Art and the Reenchantment of Sensuous Human Activity