The Influence of Skin Parameters and Body Composition on the Tolerance of Pain Stimulus Generated During Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) in Women - Pilot Study
Agata Lebiedowska,Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka,Anna Stolecka-Warzecha,Wiktoria Odrzywołek,Małgorzata Bożek,Sławomir Wilczyński
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s463676
2024-05-28
Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
Abstract:Agata Lebiedowska, Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka, Anna Stolecka-Warzecha, Wiktoria Odrzywo&lstrokek, Ma&lstrokgorzata Bo&zdotek, S&lstrokawomir Wilczy&nacuteski Department of Basic Biomedical Science, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, Poland Correspondence: Agata Lebiedowska, Department of Basic Biomedical Science, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Kasztanowa Street 3, Sosnowiec, 41-200, Poland, Tel +48 269 98 30, Email Purpose: This pilot study aims to explore how skin parameters and body composition impact the tolerance to EMS (Electrical Muscle Stimulation) stimuli in women, particularly focusing on pain tolerance in response to varying intensities of EMS. This research seeks to understand what is essential for optimizing EMS applications. Patients and Methods: The study involved 16 females (age 35.9 ± 12.3). Body composition and anthropometric measurements were taken, including BMI (Body Mass Index), weight percentage, WHtR (Waist to Height Ratio), WHR (Waist-Hip Ratio), and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis. High-frequency ultrasound scans were conducted to assess skin parameters. The EMS stimulation was performed using an Evolvex (InMode, Israel), with applicators placed around the abdomen and intensity adjusted according to patient tolerance, recorded at the pain threshold. Results: The maximum tolerated EMS stimulus varied from 12V to 55V, with a median of 33V. Body weight showed a strong positive correlation (R=0.76, p< 0.001) and hip circumference (R=0.66, p< 0.001) with EMS intensity. Body fat mass (R=0.61, p=0.012) and visceral fat area (R=0.55, p=0.029) were positively correlated with EMS intensity. However, no significant correlations were observed between EMS tolerance and muscle tissue parameters or total body water content. The study also found that skin structure parameters showed no significant impact on EMS tolerance. Conclusion: The study reveals that women's tolerance to EMS stimuli is influenced by various factors. Anthropometric parameters like hip circumference, body weight, skinfold, and BMI are strongly correlated with EMS tolerance. Body composition factors, particularly adipose tissue characteristics such as body fat mass and percentage, also significantly impact EMS intensity requirements, with no notable correlation to muscle tissue or water content. However, variations in skin structure, including thickness and density, do not significantly affect EMS tolerance. These insights are crucial for tailoring personalized EMS therapy to enhance effectiveness and comfort in both aesthetic and rehabilitative applications. Keywords: EMS, body composition, BIA, high-frequency ultrasound Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) is increasingly being recognized for its diverse applications in rehabilitation, athletic training, and pain management. This pilot study specifically aims to explore the impact of skin parameters and body composition on the tolerance of EMS stimuli in women, with a particular focus on pain tolerance in response to different intensities of EMS. EMS uses electrical impulses to induce muscle contractions, a method that has seen widespread application and research. 1–5 The effectiveness and comfort level of EMS are heavily influenced by the intensity of the electrical stimulus, which varies in its pain-inducing potential. The perception of pain, especially in response to electrical stimulation, is highly subjective and can be influenced by several physiological and psychological factors. 6,7 In women, these factors are further compounded by hormonal variations, skin characteristics, and differences in body composition. Studies have shown that hormonal fluctuations can affect pain perception and tolerance. 8,9 Additionally, the distinct properties of women's skin, such as hydration, thickness, and elasticity, are known to influence electrical conductivity, potentially altering the sensation of pain induced by EMS. 10 The higher body fat percentage in women also affects the pathway and distribution of the electrical current, which can modify the intensity of the pain stimulus experienced during EMS. 11 This study will critically examine how these variables interact to influence pain tolerance in response to varying EMS intensities in women. Understanding these relationships is key to optimizing EMS applications, ensuring they are both effective and tolerable. The variability in pain tolerance is a significant factor that can affect the acceptance and efficacy of EMS in therapeutic and fitness settings. Recent research has highlighted the importance of personalizing medical and fitness interve -Abstract Truncated-
dermatology