Abstract:Decision trees (DTs) epitomize the ideal of interpretability of machine learning (ML) models. The interpretability of decision trees motivates explainability approaches by so-called intrinsic interpretability, and it is at the core of recent proposals for applying interpretable ML models in high-risk applications. The belief in DT interpretability is justified by the fact that explanations for DT predictions are generally expected to be succinct. Indeed, in the case of DTs, explanations correspond to DT paths. Since decision trees are ideally shallow, and so paths contain far fewer features than the total number of features, explanations in DTs are expected to be succinct, and hence interpretable. This paper offers both theoretical and experimental arguments demonstrating that, as long as interpretability of decision trees equates with succinctness of explanations, then decision trees ought not be deemed interpretable. The paper introduces logically rigorous path explanations and path explanation redundancy, and proves that there exist functions for which decision trees must exhibit paths with explanation redundancy that is arbitrarily larger than the actual path explanation. The paper also proves that only a very restricted class of functions can be represented with DTs that exhibit no explanation redundancy. In addition, the paper includes experimental results substantiating that path explanation redundancy is observed ubiquitously in decision trees, including those obtained using different tree learning algorithms, but also in a wide range of publicly available decision trees. The paper also proposes polynomial-time algorithms for eliminating path explanation redundancy, which in practice require negligible time to compute. Thus, these algorithms serve to indirectly attain irreducible, and so succinct, explanations for decision trees. Furthermore, the paper includes novel results related with duality and enumeration of explanations, based on using SAT solvers as witness-producing NP-oracles.

Explainable decision forest: Transforming a decision forest into an interpretable tree

Approximating XGBoost with an interpretable decision tree

Inherently Interpretable Tree Ensemble Learning

Explaining the Predictions of Any Image Classifier via Decision Trees

Succinct Explanations With Cascading Decision Trees

GPTree: Towards Explainable Decision-Making via LLM-powered Decision Trees

LionForests: Local Interpretation of Random Forests

How to Mine Information from Each Instance to Extract an Abbreviated and Credible Logical Rule

Meta Decision Trees for Explainable Recommendation Systems

Unboxing Tree Ensembles for interpretability: a hierarchical visualization tool and a multivariate optimal re-built tree

From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees

A Uniform Language to Explain Decision Trees

DeforestVis: Behavior Analysis of Machine Learning Models with Surrogate Decision Stumps

Forest-ORE: Mining Optimal Rule Ensemble to interpret Random Forest models

A Unified Approach to Extract Interpretable Rules from Tree Ensembles via Integer Programming

BELLATREX: Building Explanations through a LocaLly AccuraTe Rule EXtractor

On Tackling Explanation Redundancy in Decision Trees

Explainable Data-Driven Optimization: From Context to Decision and Back Again

Interpretable Decision Tree Search as a Markov Decision Process

Counterfactual Explanations for Oblique Decision Trees: Exact, Efficient Algorithms

Dive into Decision Trees and Forests: A Theoretical Demonstration