Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr

Daniel R. Matute,Brandon S. Cooper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14181
IF: 4.171
2021-02-18
Evolution
Abstract:<p>Understanding the processes of population divergence and speciation remains a core question in evolutionary biology. For nearly a hundred years evolutionary geneticists have characterized reproductive isolation (RI) mechanisms and specific barriers to gene flow required for species formation. The seminal work of Coyne and Orr (1989) provided the first comprehensive comparative analysis of speciation. By combining phylogenetic hypotheses and species range data with estimates of genetic divergence and multiple mechanisms of RI across <i>Drosophila</i>, Coyne and Orr (1989)'s influential meta‐analyses answered fundamental questions and motivated new analyses that continue to push the field forward today (Turelli and Begun 1997; Fitzpatrick 2002; Funk et al. 2006; Yukilevich 2012; Turelli et al. 2014). Now 30 years later, we revisit the five questions addressed by Coyne and Orr (1989), identifying results that remain well supported and others that seem less robust with new data. We then consider the future of speciation research, with emphasis on areas where novel methods and data motivate potential progress. While the literature remains biased towards <i>Drosophila</i> and other model systems, we are enthusiastic about the future of the field.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p>
ecology,genetics & heredity,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?