Definitive radiotherapy or surgery for early oral squamous cell carcinoma in old and very old patients: A propensity-score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study

Wen-Chi Liu,Hsueh-Erh Liu,Yi-Wei Kao,Lei Qin,Kuan-Chou Lin,Chih-Yuan Fang,Lo-Lin Tsai,Ben-Chang Shia,Szu-Yuan Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.016
IF: 6.901
2020-10-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>Although patients aged &gt;70 years are subject to early oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (E-OCSCC), evidence is currently lacking regarding the probable outcomes of definitive radiotherapy (RT) compared to surgery in this population.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>We recruited patients aged ≥70 years with a diagnosis of E-OCSCC from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. Propensity score matching was performed, and Cox proportional-hazards model curves were used to analyze all-cause mortality of patients at different age intervals undergoing different treatments.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The matching process yielded a final cohort of 604 patients in the definitive RT and surgery cohorts who were eligible for further analysis. These patients were classified as old (70–80 years) and very old (&gt;80 years). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for surgery compared with definitive RT was 0.465 (0.354–0.610, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The aHR (95% CI) for age &gt; 80 years compared with age 70–80 years was 2.370 (1.720, 3.265, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The aHR (95% CI) for T2N0M0 compared with T1N0M0 was 1.752 (1.321–2.32, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The aHR (95% CI) for Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 2 compared with CCI = 0 was 1.264 (1.137–1.738, <em>P</em> = 0.011). After stratified analysis, the aHRs for surgery compared with definitive RT were 0.484 (0.352–0.665, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and 0.411 (0.232–0.728, <em>P</em> = 0.002) among old and very old patients with E-OCSCC, respectively.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Surgery may be more beneficial than definitive RT in selected elderly patients with E-OCSCC.</p>
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?