Clinicians' experiences and perspectives of a web-based lung cancer referral pathway.

Zulfiquer Ali Otty,Sabe S. Sabesan,Sarah Larkins,Rebecca Evans,Amy Brown
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e13539
IF: 45.3
2024-05-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e13539 Background: Efficient and streamlined referral of patients with suspected lung cancer is an integral part of providing optimal care for these patients. There is emerging evidence that use of online care pathways, such as HealthPathways is associated with improved referral quality from primary care, more timely access to secondary care and standardization of clinical management decisions by general practitioners (GPs). The Townsville Lung Cancer Referral Pathway (TLCRP) is part of ' Townsville HealthPathways', which is the evidence-based clinical pathway portal used in the Townsville Hospital and Health service in northern Australia. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of clinicians about TLCRP. Methods: This was a descriptive qualitative study nested within a larger project evaluating TLCRP, utilising a broader implementation science framework. In-depth, semi-structured interviews of GPs and lung cancer specialists were conducted. An iterative, inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts was undertaken to derive key codes and themes regarding participant experiences and perceptions. Results: Twenty interviews were conducted, 14 with GPs and six with specialists across disciplines of respiratory medicine, oncology, and cardiothoracic surgery. Of the GPs, 11 were practicing in the regional locality of Townsville and three practiced in surrounding rural areas. Interview analysis identified two major themes and several sub-themes (Table). Several enablers and barriers to implementing TLCRP were identified. Barriers to adaptation of TLCRP included lack of clinical time, resistance to changing referral patterns, lack of familiarity or experience with HealthPathways and technology issues. Enablers included clinical usefulness of TLCRP, support from HealthPathways implementing team, integration of TLCRP with the electronic referral system and positive feedback from specialists. Conclusions: Emerging themes from this study may be used to reduce the barriers and improve uptake of TLCRP and other health care pathways in the local health service. Improving the uptake of TLCRP may mean that more patients in our region experience a streamlined journey to more timely specialist lung cancer care and improved health outcomes. [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?