Abstract:Purpose This paper investigates the static and dynamic directional return spillovers and dependence among green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets from January 2013 to September 2020. Design/methodology/approach This study employed both the quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) and time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) technique to examine the magnitude of static and dynamic directional spillovers and dependence of markets. Findings Results show that the magnitude of connectedness is extremely higher at quantile levels (q = 0.05 and q = 0.95) compared to those in the mean of the conditional distribution. This connotes that connectedness between green bonds and other assets increases with shock size for both negative and positive shocks. This further indicates that return shocks spread at a higher magnitude during extreme market conditions relative to normal periods. Additional analyses show the behavior of return transmission between green bond and other assets is asymmetric. Practical implications The findings of this study offer significant implications for portfolio investors, policymakers, regulatory authorities and investment community in terms of carefully assessing the unique characteristics offered by each markets in terms of return spillovers and dependence and diversifying the portfolios. Originality/value The study, first, uses a relatively new statistical technique, the QVAR advanced by Ando et al. (2018), to capture upper and lower tails' quantile price connectedness and directional spillover. Therefore, the results possess adequate power against departure from mean-based conditional connectedness. Second, using a portfolio of green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets, the uniqueness of this study lies in the examination of the static and dynamic dependence of the markets examined.

Extreme time-varying spillovers between high carbon emission stocks, green bond and crude oil: Comment

Extreme risk transmission mechanism between oil, green bonds and new energy vehicles

Extreme Risk Spillovers Between Crude Oil and Stock Markets

The Impact of COVID-19 on Global Financial Markets: A Multiscale Volatility Spillover Analysis

Spillover effects between fossil energy and green markets: Evidence from informational inefficiency

Tail risk transmission between decomposed oil shocks and green finance markets: evidence from an EVT–TVP–VAR approach

The Time-Varying Spillover Effects between China’s Carbon Markets and Energy Market: Evidence Using the TVP-DY Index Model

Dynamic spillover effects and portfolio strategies between crude oil, gold and Chinese stock markets related to new energy vehicle

Analyzing the static and dynamic dependence among green investments, carbon markets, financial markets and commodity markets

Asymmetric causality of economic policy uncertainty and oil volatility index on time-varying nexus of the clean energy, carbon and green bond

The dynamic risk spillover effects among carbon, renewable energy, and electricity markets based on the TVP-VAR-DY model

Volatility Spillovers and Heavy Tails: A Large t-Vector AutoRegressive Approach

Research on volatility spillover effects between traditional energy market and China's new energy vehicle stock market

Time-varying spillover effects and investment strategies between WTI crude oil, natural gas and Chinese stock markets related to belt and road initiative

Extreme co-movements between decomposed oil price shocks and sustainable investments

Spillover in higher‐order moments across carbon and energy markets: A portfolio view

ynamic time-domain and frequency-domain spillovers and portfolio strategies between climate change attention and energy-relevant markets

Spillover effects among crude oil, carbon, and stock markets: evidence from nonparametric causality-in-quantiles tests

The extreme spillover from climate policy uncertainty to the Chinese sector stock market: wavelet time-varying approach

Volatility spillover and hedging strategies among Chinese carbon, energy, and electricity markets

Do climate policy uncertainty and investor sentiment drive the dynamic spillovers among green finance markets?