Abstract:Policy effect might be multidimensional and spill over to non-recipients. It is unclear how the implementation of Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) policy affects depression in non-disabled people and how this effect differs in different non-disabled groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to explore the impact of Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) policy on the depression levels of non-disabled populations and analyze the heterogeneity of this impact among different demographic groups. Specifically, the study focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Policy Effect Evaluation**: Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) method and nationally representative health survey data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the study evaluates the impact of the LTCI policy on the depression levels of non-disabled populations aged 45 and above.
2. **Heterogeneity Analysis**: Discusses the differences in the impact of the LTCI policy on depression levels among different demographic groups, including retirement status, economic support, and social participation status.
### Research Background
With the aging population and increasing demand for long-term care, many countries have established long-term care systems, such as France, Italy, and Portugal. The World Health Organization (WHO) released a new framework in 2021 to help countries achieve integrated long-term care systems. China launched the LTCI policy in 15 pilot cities in 2016, aiming to raise funds through social health insurance to provide financial or service guarantees for basic life care and basic medical care for the long-term disabled.
### Research Methods
1. **Data Source**: Uses CHARLS data from 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018.
2. **Sample Selection**: Ultimately retained observation data for 9,279 non-disabled individuals aged 45 and above without difficulties in daily living activities.
3. **Variable Definitions**:
- **Dependent Variable**: Depression levels, measured using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10).
- **Independent Variable**: Implementation status of the LTCI policy, with a value of 1 indicating that the city is a pilot city and the policy was implemented in the survey year, otherwise 0.
- **Control Variables**: Include age, gender, education level, social participation, smoking, physical activity, number of co-residing family members, number of children, household income, living environment, economic support, emotional support, public pension, and public health insurance coverage.
4. **Statistical Analysis**: Uses the DID method for causal effect analysis, and conducts parallel trend tests, robustness tests, and placebo tests.
### Main Results
1. **Primary Results**: The LTCI policy significantly reduced the depression levels of non-disabled populations, with an average reduction of 0.76 units.
2. **Heterogeneity Analysis**:
- **Non-Retired Population**: Depression levels significantly reduced by 0.8267 units.
- **Population with Economic Support**: Depression levels significantly reduced by 0.7079 units.
- **Population without Social Participation**: Depression levels significantly reduced by 1.2161 units.
### Conclusion
The LTCI policy significantly reduced the depression levels of non-disabled populations in China, with more pronounced effects on non-retired individuals, those with economic support, and those without social participation. The study highlights the depression-reducing effect of the LTCI policy on non-beneficiaries and suggests paying attention to these specific groups during the promotion of the LTCI policy.