Climate mitigation potential of cover crops in the United States is regionally concentrated and lower than previous estimates

Lisa Eash,Stephen Ogle,Shelby C. McClelland,Steven J. Fonte,Meagan E. Schipanski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17372
IF: 11.6
2024-06-19
Global Change Biology
Abstract:The United States has substantially increased investment in cover crop (CC) incentives to meet emission reduction targets, but the extent to which improved crop management can mitigate climate change is contested. Using the DayCent biogeochemical model and current national survey data, we estimated the mitigation potential of CCs in the United States to be 39.0 ± 24.1 Mt CO2e year−1, 45%–65% lower than previous assessments. The majority (75%) of this potential is concentrated in the North Central, Southern Great Plains, and Lower Mississippi regions. This work provides timely evidence for the limited potential of CC adoption to contribute to US emissions targets and informs where CC incentive programs should be prioritized. Widespread adoption of regenerative agriculture practices is an integral part of the US plan to achieve net‐zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. National incentives have particularly increased for the adoption of cover crops (CCs), which have presumably large carbon (C) sequestration potential. However, assessments of national CC climate benefits have not fully considered regional variability, changing C sequestration rates over time, and potential N2O trade‐offs. Using the DayCent soil biogeochemical model and current national survey data, we estimate CC climate change mitigation potential to be 39.0 ± 24.1 Mt CO2e year−1, which is 45%–65% lower than previous estimates, with large uncertainty attributed to N2O impacts. Three‐fourths of this climate change mitigation potential is concentrated in the North Central, Southern Great Plains and Lower Mississippi regions. Public investment should be focused in these regions to maximize CC climate benefits, but the national contribution of CC to emissions targets may be lower than previously anticipated.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?