Abstract:Importance Stroke is the fifth-highest cause of death in the US and a leading cause of serious long-term disability with particularly high risk in Black individuals. Quality risk prediction algorithms, free of bias, are key for comprehensive prevention strategies. Objective To compare the performance of stroke-specific algorithms with pooled cohort equations developed for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for the prediction of new-onset stroke across different subgroups (race, sex, and age) and to determine the added value of novel machine learning techniques. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study on combined and harmonized data from Black and White participants of the Framingham Offspring, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), Multi-Ethnic Study for Atherosclerosis (MESA), and Reasons for Geographical and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) studies (1983-2019) conducted in the US. The 62 482 participants included at baseline were at least 45 years of age and free of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Exposures Published stroke-specific algorithms from Framingham and REGARDS (based on self-reported risk factors) as well as pooled cohort equations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease plus 2 newly developed machine learning algorithms. Main Outcomes and Measures Models were designed to estimate the 10-year risk of new-onset stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic). Discrimination concordance index (C index) and calibration ratios of expected vs observed event rates were assessed at 10 years. Analyses were conducted by race, sex, and age groups. Results The combined study sample included 62 482 participants (median age, 61 years, 54% women, and 29% Black individuals). Discrimination C indexes were not significantly different for the 2 stroke-specific models (Framingham stroke, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.72-073; REGARDS self-report, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.72-0.74) vs the pooled cohort equations (0.72; 95% CI, 0.71-0.73): differences 0.01 or less (P values >.05) in the combined sample. Significant differences in discrimination were observed by race: the C indexes were 0.76 for all 3 models in White vs 0.69 in Black women (all P values <.001) and between 0.71 and 0.72 in White men and between 0.64 and 0.66 in Black men (all P values ≤.001). When stratified by age, model discrimination was better for younger (<60 years) vs older (≥60 years) adults for both Black and White individuals. The ratios of observed to expected 10-year stroke rates were closest to 1 for the REGARDS self-report model (1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09) and indicated risk overestimation for Framingham stroke (0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89) and pooled cohort equations (0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.77). Performance did not significantly improve when novel machine learning algorithms were applied. Conclusions and Relevance In this analysis of Black and White individuals without stroke or transient ischemic attack among 4 US cohorts, existing stroke-specific risk prediction models and novel machine learning techniques did not significantly improve discriminative accuracy for new-onset stroke compared with the pooled cohort equations, and the REGARDS self-report model had the best calibration. All algorithms exhibited worse discrimination in Black individuals than in White individuals, indicating the need to expand the pool of risk factors and improve modeling techniques to address observed racial disparities and improve model performance.

Separating Risk Prediction: Myocardial Infarction vs. Ischemic Stroke in 6.2M Screenings

Cerebral Microbleeds and Stroke Risk after Ischaemic Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attack: a Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Cohort Studies.

Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Women with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Machine Learning Approach

The Effect of Sample Age and Prediction Resolution on Myocardial Infarction Risk Prediction

Machine Learning-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Model: A Cohort Study on the Korean National Health Insurance Service Health Screening Database

Development of a Model to Predict 10-Year Risk of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke and Ischemic Heart Disease Using the China Kadoorie Biobank

Pre-existing and machine learning-based models for cardiovascular risk prediction

Universal Risk Prediction for Individuals With and Without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model for 6-year risk of stroke: a cohort study in middle-aged and elderly Chinese population

Predictive Accuracy of Stroke Risk Prediction Models Across Black and White Race, Sex, and Age Groups.

Development of machine learning-based models to predict 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort study

The development and implementation of stroke risk prediction model in National Health Insurance Service's personal health record

Prediction models for major adverse cardiovascular events following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and subgroup-specific performance

Risk Prediction for Sudden Cardiac Death in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Personalized prediction model specific for sudden cardiac death in the population: a machine learning study based on EHR

Prediction of the Risk of Mortality Using Risk Score in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Predictors of cardiovascular disease risk: findings from the National Survey of Health and Development Cohort

Development and validation of a deep learning–based cardiovascular disease risk prediction model for long-term breast cancer survivors.

It's Time to Add Electrocardiography and Echocardiography to CVD Risk Prediction Models: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review

Stroke risk prediction models: A systematic review and meta-analysis