0994 Legal Considerations for Sleep and Mental Health: A Review of Foster Care Bedroom Guidelines Among 50 U.S. States

Karolina Rusin,Grace Neblett,Amy Wolfson,Carol Ripple,Eleanor McGlinchey,Candice Alfano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0994

IF: 6.313

2024-04-20

SLEEP

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Each year, the foster care system provides out-of-home placement for over 400,000 children, who are temporarily or permanently separated from their families. The prevalence of sleep and mental health problems in this population is well-documented. Persistent sleep problems associated with past and ongoing trauma independently elevate long-term risk for a host of physical and psychiatric disorders. While federal laws provide universal requirements for safe foster placements, the extent to which individual state laws and guidelines address child sleep health and environments varies. The aim of this policy review of administrative codes and guidelines regarding sleep/bedroom arrangements for children in foster care in all 50 U.S. states was to document that variability and examine whether state regulations incorporate sleep research findings. Methods Applicable bedroom and bed sharing guidelines were retrieved from each state’s government websites, followed by coding, categorization, and a systematic review. Categories included 7 broad themes: Bed Sharing, Room Sharing, Space Requirements, Bed Requirements, Caregiver-Child Requirements, Health, and Miscellaneous. Results While 39 states (78%) required an individual bed for each child in care, specific guidelines regarding bed and bedroom sharing with other children varied greatly by state. There was an even distribution across states that allowed bed or bedroom sharing for siblings (50%) and those that did not address this topic (50%), but only 6 states stated the importance of keeping sibling groups together when determining appropriate sleeping arrangements. In addition, a few states mentioned history of neglect, abuse, and trauma as factors to consider for sleep/bedroom guidelines. Only 10 states (20%) allowed bedroom sharing with a caregiver during emergencies, such as illness or periods of emotional distress. Conclusion Despite the universal importance of healthy sleep for all aspects of child development, we found striking differences between states regarding rules and guidelines for sleep and bedroom sharing. Most requirements lack consideration of children’s potential history of abuse and trauma, which contribute to sleep problems in this population. Also concerning is the lack of clear regulations regarding caregiver intervention in case of emergencies. We urge policymakers to reconsider current guidelines in accordance with sleep research and evidence-based practices. Support (if any)

neurosciences,clinical neurology