Comparisons of nitrite accumulation, microbial behavior and nitrification kinetic in continuous stirred tank (ST) and plug flow (PF) moving bed biofilm reactors

Miao Zhang,Jing Gao,Yajun Fan,Quanlong Liu,Chenjie Zhu,Liying Ge,Chengda He,Jun Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130410
IF: 8.8
2021-09-01
Chemosphere
Abstract:<p>Two types of continuous stirred tank moving bed biofilm reactors (ST-MBBR) and plug flow MBBR (PF-MBBR) were compared for nitrification. PF-MBBR showed strong shock resistance to temperature, and ammonium oxidation ratio (AOR) was 9.63% higher than that in the ST-MBBR, although the average biomass and biofilm thickness of ST-MBBR were 7.32–18.59%, 9.44–14.06% higher than those in the PF-MBBR. Meanwhile, a lower nitrite accumulation ratio (NAR) was observed (54.88%) in the PF-MBBR than the ST-MBBR (78.92%) due to different operation modes, and the divergence was demonstrated by the microbial quantitative analysis. Nitrification kinetics revealed that the temperature coefficient (<em>θ</em>) in the ST-MBBR (1.068) was much higher than that in the PF-MBBR (1.006–1.015), proving the contrasting nitrification performances caused by temperature shock. According to the Monod equation, the half-saturation coefficient (<em>K</em><sub><em>N</em></sub>) in the ST-MBBR was 0.19 mg/L while it varied around 0.12–0.24 mg/L in the PF-MBBR, revealing various NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> affinity owing to different biofilm thickness and microbial composition. Finally, MBBR optimization related to operation mode, temperature, and free ammonium (FA) inhibition for nitrite accumulation was discussed.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?