Direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from CO 2 : From the perspective of dimethyl-carbonate, a promising material for the future

Seonghun Kim,Seok Goo Lee,Dong Hwi Jeong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.02.010
IF: 4.119
2024-02-19
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Abstract:Highlights • A modified process simulation based on fractional conversion of experiment of DMC using CO 2 . • Economic feasibility is compared for the three simulated cases using APEA V12. • By sensitivity analysis, the price of DMC for case 1 and utility cost for case 2 and 3 are the most effective parameters. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have grown and reached 33.9 Gt of CO 2 equivalents in 2020. Its amounts have continuously increased since the industrial revolution, so, carbon capture and utilization and storage (CCUS) technology can mitigate CO 2 emission and global warming. Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) has attracted attention as it is used as a solvent in lithium-ion batteries. We proposed a modified process simulation based on the fractional converion of experiment of direct synthesis of the DMC using CO 2 . Also, to separate azeotropic mixture, ethylene glycol is used as an entrainer. We changed the feed of the CO 2 and changed the design when CO 2 feed is lower than stoichiometry ratio. Economic feasibility for all cases was evaluated using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA) V12. As a result, the total annual cost for the case 1, 2 and 3 is US 9.88 M /yr and US 10.3 M , US − 56.66 M . Sensitivity analysis is performed to examine the effect of the NPV while changing the economic parameters such as utility cost and DMC selling price from − 30% to 30%. The most effective parameter of the NPV is the selling price of the DMC for case 1 and utility cost for case 2 and 3. A lower DMC selling price and solving deactivation problem of catalyst are the potential to develop the CCU technology.
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?