Fabian Holzgreve,Celine Nazzal,Rasem Nazzal,Rejane Golbach,David A. Groneberg,Christian Maurer-Grubinger,Eileen M. Wanke,Daniela Ohlendorf
Abstract:Work-related forced postures, such as prolonged standing work, can lead to complaints in the lower back. Current research suggests that there is increased evidence of associations between patients with low back pain (LBP) and reduced lordosis in the lumbar spine and generally less spinal tilt in the sagittal plane. The aim of this study is to extend the influence of LBP to other parameters of upper body posture in standing, taking into account the rotational and frontal planes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is: studying the differences in upper body posture between patients with low back pain (LBP) and healthy individuals in a standing position, particularly considering the effects of gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). Specifically, the study aims to extend the impact of LBP on other parameters of upper body posture while standing, including changes in the rotational and frontal planes.
### Background
Work-related forced postures, such as prolonged standing, may lead to lower back discomfort. Current research indicates an association between LBP and reduced lumbar curvature and reduced spinal tilt in the sagittal plane. However, these studies mainly focus on changes in the sagittal plane parameters, with less attention to changes in the rotational and frontal planes. Therefore, this study aims to explore the impact of LBP on other parameters of upper body posture while standing, including the rotational and frontal planes.
### Methods
The study included a non-LBP group (418 males, 412 females, aged 21-65 years) and an LBP group (138 subjects: 80 females, 58 males, aged 18-86 years), all of whom were medically diagnosed with lumbar spine syndrome (LSS). Posture was assessed using the "ABW BodyMapper" back scanner from ABW GmbH, Germany, through video raster stereography. Statistical analysis used two-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-U tests to evaluate the relationship of back posture parameters between the LBP and non-LBP groups. Linear regression and logarithmic regression were used to analyze the relationship between independent variables (group, gender, height, weight, and BMI) and posture parameters. The significance level was set at α = 0.05 (95% confidence level).
### Results
Regression analysis showed that sagittal plane parameters of the spine (sagittal trunk tilt, thoracic and lumbar curvature angles, kyphosis, and lordosis angles) mainly depended on gender, age, BMI, height, and/or weight, but not on group (LBP/non-LBP). In the shoulder area, a significant correlation was found between group and scapular rotation. In the pelvic area, significant correlations were found only in the transverse plane, particularly the relationship between pelvic torsion and BMI, weight, and height, as well as pelvic rotation and group, age, and gender.
### Discussion
This study focused on comparing the overall upper body posture of individuals with and without LBP, particularly considering the effects of gender, age, and BMI. Although intergroup comparisons of all subjects showed isolated significant differences in the frontal plane of the spine and shoulders, as well as the transverse plane of the shoulders and pelvis, these differences were not clinically significant. These differences were mainly within the range of measurement error or very close to its range. Gender appears to be the main factor affecting upper body posture, particularly in terms of sagittal plane parameters (kyphosis angle and lordosis angle). Compared to females, males had a kyphosis angle that was 8.52° lower and a lordosis angle that was 16.11° lower. BMI was also an important factor affecting the kyphosis angle, with the kyphosis angle increasing by 3.32° for each unit increase in BMI. Additionally, increases in height and weight also affected the kyphosis angle.
### Conclusion
The study results indicate that gender is the main factor affecting upper body posture, particularly in terms of sagittal plane parameters. Although there are significant differences in certain posture parameters between the LBP and non-LBP groups, these differences are not clinically significant. Therefore, future research should further explore other factors that may affect upper body posture and develop targeted interventions.