Abstract:<p>Within its function of controlling urban development and regulating land use (particularly housing provision), land reserve systems impact urbanization processes. In China, the land reserve system has played a complex role in the rapid urbanization over the past years, as one of the most significant land use policies in land system reform and land resource administration. However, there are as yet few quantitative studies on the role of the land reserve system, particularly its impact on quality of urbanization on the basis of the people-oriented principle. To examine the relationship between the land reserve system and the quality of urbanization, including how land reserve financing impacts urbanization, this paper first develops an index system for quality of urbanization on the basis of the people-oriented principle, and measures the quality of urbanization from the perspective of accommodating human needs. Then, taking China as an example, it analyzes the impact of the government's land reserve system on the quality of urbanization and its conduction mechanism, using municipal panel data from 2008 to 2014. The results show that the land reserve system had a positive impact on the quality of urbanization; the mediatory effects of urban development space, urban construction expenditure, and housing price are verified in the influence process. Further, although some negative impacts are observed due to higher land prices, etcetera, it is through the land reserve system that local governments are able to acquire space and funding for urban construction and development, which are used to invest in infrastructure and provide public services for accommodating multilevel human needs, including physiological, safety, self-esteem, and self-improvement needs in the long run. Therefore, this paper provides evidence that the land reserve system has improved the quality of urbanization to a certain extent in China. The study is also of great significance in the quest to understand the differences of urbanization in different regions, and the findings have implications for other countries and regions in similar contexts.</p>
environmental studies,urban studies,regional & urban planning,development studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the effects of bicarbonate hemodialysis (Bi HD) and acetate hemodialysis (Ac HD) under the condition of high - sodium dialysate, especially the differences in hemodynamic and respiratory effects. Specifically, the researchers hope to determine, through a double - blind crossover trial design, whether bicarbonate hemodialysis has more obvious advantages than acetate hemodialysis when using high - sodium dialysate (140 mEq/L).
### Research Background
Chronic hemodialysis patients often encounter a series of uncomfortable symptoms, such as hypotension, nausea, vomiting, etc. The frequency and severity of these symptoms affect the patient's quality of life. In order to improve this situation, researchers began to explore the impact of different dialysate components on the dialysis effect. In particular, replacing acetate in the dialysate with bicarbonate is considered to be able to significantly improve the patient's symptoms, but this view has not been uniformly recognized. In addition, increasing the sodium concentration in the dialysate has also been proven to improve hemodynamic tolerance.
### Research Objectives
This study aims to compare the differences between bicarbonate hemodialysis and acetate hemodialysis in the following aspects under the condition of high - sodium dialysate through a double - blind crossover trial:
1. **Hemodynamic Effects**: Changes in indicators such as blood pressure and heart rate.
2. **Respiratory Effects**: Changes in indicators such as carbon dioxide excretion, minute ventilation volume, and arterial oxygen tension.
3. **Clinical Symptoms and Treatment Interventions**: Evaluate the frequency of adverse symptoms and the number of required treatment interventions under the two dialysis methods.
### Main Findings
- **Hemodynamic Effects**: Under the two dialysis methods, the changes in hemodynamic parameters (such as blood pressure and heart rate) are similar, indicating that there is no significant difference between the two in maintaining hemodynamic stability.
- **Respiratory Effects**: The changes in respiratory parameters under the two dialysis methods are also similar, manifested as a decrease in carbon dioxide excretion and minute ventilation volume.
- **Clinical Symptoms and Treatment Interventions**: Although the frequency of adverse symptoms under the two dialysis methods is similar, during bicarbonate hemodialysis, the number of required treatment interventions is significantly reduced.
- **Blood Chemical Indicators**: The serum bicarbonate concentration and pH value before and after bicarbonate hemodialysis are higher than those of acetate hemodialysis, and this difference still exists during the dialysis interval.
### Conclusions
This study shows that when using high - sodium dialysate (140 mEq/L), bicarbonate hemodialysis and acetate hemodialysis show similar results in terms of hemodynamic and respiratory effects. However, bicarbonate hemodialysis significantly reduces the number of required treatment interventions and increases the serum bicarbonate concentration and pH value before and after dialysis. Therefore, bicarbonate hemodialysis provides a moderate improvement in some aspects.
### Formula Representation
The formulas involved in the article are as follows:
- The calculation formula of mean arterial pressure (MAP):
\[
\text{MAP}=\text{diastolic blood pressure}+\frac{1}{3}\times(\text{systolic blood pressure}-\text{diastolic blood pressure})
\]
In summary, this study provides certain evidence for the advantages of bicarbonate hemodialysis over acetate hemodialysis, especially in reducing the number of treatment interventions and improving blood chemical indicators.