Comparing spinal loads in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation with and without chronic low back Pain: An EMG-Informed approach

Courtney M. Butowicz,Pawel R. Golyski,Julian C. Acasio,Brad D. Hendershot
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111966
IF: 2.4
2024-02-04
Journal of Biomechanics
Abstract:Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA), likely due in part to biomechanical factors. Here, three-dimensional full-body kinematics and kinetics during level-ground walking, at a self-selected and three controlled speeds (1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 m/s), were collected from twenty-one persons with unilateral transtibial LLA, with (n = 9) and without cLBP (n = 12). Peak compressive, mediolateral, and anteroposterior L5-S1 spinal loads were estimated from a full-body, transtibial amputation-specific OpenSim model and compared between groups. Predicted lumbar joint torques from muscle activations were compared to inverse dynamics and predicted and measured electromyographic muscle activations were compared for model evaluation and verification. Despite no group differences in compressive loads (p > 0.5), in the cLBP group, anteroposterior shear forces increased (p < 0.001) while peak contralateral shear forces increased during prosthetic (p = 0.007) as walking speed increased. With no pain, predicted peak muscle activations of intact-side external obliques (p = 0.03) and internal obliques (p = 0.002) increased as speed increased; while prosthetic-side psoas activation increased to a greater extent as speed increased the no pain group (intact (p = 0.001), prosthetic stance (p = 0.02)). Predicted muscle activations demonstrated similar activation patterns to electromyographic-measured activations (r = 0.56–0.98), and error between inverse dynamics and simulated spinal moments was low (0.08 Nm RMS error). Persons with transtibial LLA and cLBP may adopt movement strategies during walking to reduce shear forces at the L5-S1 joint, particularly as walking speed increases. However, future work is needed to understand the time course from pain onset to chronification and the cumulative influence of increased spinal loads over time.
engineering, biomedical,biophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?