Abstract:It is well known that big fish eat small fish, but how does it change that relationship in 3D environments (the sea) versus 2D (bottom of the sea) environments is not clear. The role of dimensionality of predator search space and feeding strategies (crabs vs. snails) are critical. Disentangling the determinants of trophic structure is central to ecology. The capacity to capture subjugate and consume a prey (i.e. gape limitation) is a relevant limitation to acquire energy for most organisms, especially those in smaller size ranges. This generates a size hierarchy of trophic positions in which large organisms consume small ones. Body size is tightly correlated to gape limitation and explains a large fraction of variance in the body size‐trophic position relationship. However, a considerable fraction of variance still remains to be explained. Consumer search space dimensionality (2D or 3D) and feeding strategies, temperature and the size structure of primary producers can alter the trophic structure, but tests based on information from natural food webs are scarce. We generated specific predictions about the body size trophic position relationship and evaluated them using information from a subtropical South Atlantic coastal marine ecosystem: benthic realm (2D, rocky shore and sandy beach) and the pelagic realm (3D). We characterized this marine coastal food web based on stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen from 256 samples from primary producers (macroalgae and phytoplankton) to large predators (sand shark) in summer and winter. Consumer body size encompassed six orders of magnitude in weight from 10−2 to 6 × 104 g. Isotopic signal corresponded to an integration of carbon sources from basal consumers to top predators. The body size‐trophic position relationship showed a linear positive association with different slopes for the benthic and pelagic environments. This implies a smaller predator prey size ratio for pelagic (3D) with respect to benthic consumers (2D) as theoretically expected. No seasonal differences were found in slopes and most of the overall variance in benthic environments was largely explained by feeding strategies of the different taxonomic groups. We provide an integrated evaluation on the role of body size, consumer search space and feeding strategy to understand the determinants of trophic position. Results demonstrate that integrating gape limitation hypothesis, the dimensionality of consumer search space and feeding strategies into a formal robust framework to understand trophic structure is feasible even in complex natural ecosystems. Resumen Identificar los determinantes de la estructura trófica es central en ecología. El presente trabajo brinda evidencia empírica sobre el rol del tamaño corporal, la dimensión del espacio de búsqueda de los depredadores y la estrategia de alimentación como determinantes de la posición trófica y su relación con el tamaño. La capacidad de capturar y consumir presas limitado por la apertura de boca es una restricción para la obtención de energía, especialmente en aquellos de pequeño tamaño. Este mecanismo genera una jerarquía de tamaños en la posición trófica de los organismos, donde los grandes consumen a los más pequeños, explicando así gran parte de la variación en la relación tamaño corporal‐posición trófica. Sin embargo, la dimensión espacial en la búsqueda de presas (2D, 3D), la temperatura, las estrategias alimentarias y la productividad primaria del sistema pueden modificar la relación esperada. Esto ha sido escasamente explorado in situ en tramas tróficas naturales. El presente trabajo estableció predicciones específicas en la relación tamaño corporal posición trófica y lo evaluó en diferentes módulos de un ecosistema subtropical marino‐costero de Sudamérica: el ambiente bentónico (2D, costa rocosa y playa arenosa) y pelágico (3D). La estructura trófica se caracterizó mediante isótopos estables de carbono y nitrógeno en 256 organismos, desde productores primarios (macroalgas y fitoplancton) hasta grandes depredadores (tiburón sarda) en verano e invierno. El rango de tamaños corporales abarcó 6 órdenes de magnitud en peso, desde 10−2 a 6 × 104 g. La señal isotópica indicó una integración de fuentes de carbono desde los consumidores primarios hasta los depredadores superiores. Se observó una relación lineal positiva entre el tamaño corporal y la posición trófica, con una pendiente menor para el ambiente pelágico (3D) con respecto al bentónico (2D), coincidente con las predicciones teóricas. No se observaron diferencias estacionales. La relación tamaño corporal y la posición trófica del ambiente bentónico presentó una gran variabilidad, con restricciones diferenciales entre grupos taxonómicos según sus hábitos alimentarios. Esta evaluación basada en el tamaño corporal, el espacio de búsqueda y la estrategia de alimentación permiten comprender los determinantes de la posici -Abstract Truncated-

Body size rules habitat selection and population declines after drought periods in a carnivore community of the Sahara Desert

Living in the edge: large terrestrial mammal and bird species traits and the ability to cope with extreme environmental conditions and human disturbance in a tropical dry forest in Colombia

Droughts reshape apex predator space use and intraguild overlap

Response of a carnivore community to water management in a semi-arid savanna

Negative impact of mild arid conditions in natural rodent populations revealed using markers of physiological condition in natura

Body size modulates the extent of seasonal diet switching by large mammalian herbivores in Yellowstone National Park

Habitat dimensionality and feeding strategies but not temperature as determinants of body size‐trophic structure relationship in a marine food web

The influence of food availability, quality and body size on patch selection of coexisting grazer ungulates in western Serengeti National Park

Body size and trophic structure explain global asymmetric response of tetrapod diversity to climate effects

Investigating the Biotic and Abiotic Drivers of Body Size Disparity in Communities of Non‐Volant Terrestrial Mammals

Do Mesocarnivores Respond to the Seasonality in Management Practices in an Agroforestry Landscape?

Limited spatiotemporal niche partitioning among mesocarnivores in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique

Seasonal acclimation of energy and water balance in desert‐dwelling rodents of South America

Bioenergetic trophic trade-offs determine mass-dependent extinction thresholds across the Cenozoic

Environmental context shapes the relationship between grass consumption and body size in African herbivore communities

Contemporary Body Size Variation of Neotropical Rodents: Environmental and Genetic Effects

Which is the appropriate scale to assess the impact of landscape spatial configuration on the diet and behavior of spider monkeys?

Relative abundance of a mesocarnivore in a human-dominated, semi-arid rangeland in Namibia

Assessing the influence of body size on patterns of dietary niche segregation among the ungulate community in Yellowstone National Park, USA

Contrasting impacts of different-sized herbivores on species richness of Mediterranean annual pastures differing in primary productivity

Climatic Suitability Derived from Species Distribution Models Captures Community Responses to an Extreme Drought Episode