CRISPR/Cas9 as a Mutagenic Factor

Andrey R. Shumega,Youri I. Pavlov,Angelina V. Chirinskaite,Aleksandr A. Rubel,Sergey G. Inge-Vechtomov,Elena I. Stepchenkova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020823

IF: 5.6

2024-01-10

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract:The discovery of the CRISPR/Cas9 microbial adaptive immune system has revolutionized the field of genetics, by greatly enhancing the capacity for genome editing. CRISPR/Cas9-based editing starts with DNA breaks (or other lesions) predominantly at target sites and, unfortunately, at off-target genome sites. DNA repair systems differing in accuracy participate in establishing desired genetic changes but also introduce unwanted mutations, that may lead to hereditary, oncological, and other diseases. New approaches to alleviate the risks associated with genome editing include attenuating the off-target activity of editing complex through the use of modified forms of Cas9 nuclease and single guide RNA (sgRNA), improving delivery methods for sgRNA/Cas9 complex, and directing DNA lesions caused by the sgRNA/Cas9 to non-mutagenic repair pathways. Here, we have described CRISPR/Cas9 as a new powerful mutagenic factor, discussed its mutagenic properties, and reviewed factors influencing the mutagenic activity of CRISPR/Cas9.

biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the role of the CRISPR/Cas9 system as a mutagenic factor and its potential genotoxicity. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Mutagenic Properties of CRISPR/Cas9**: The paper describes in detail how the CRISPR/Cas9 system induces mutations by introducing DNA damage at target and off-target sites. These mutations may include short insertions or deletions (indels), base substitutions, chromosomal abnormalities, and aneuploidy.

2. **DNA Repair Mechanisms**: The paper discusses that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) caused by CRISPR/Cas9 are primarily repaired through two pathways: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR). NHEJ often leads to genetic variations because this process involves low-fidelity DNA polymerases, which are prone to introducing errors. Although HDR is more precise, it can also lead to gene and chromosomal mutations in certain cases.

3. **Factors Affecting Mutagenic Activity**: The paper analyzes various factors that influence the mutagenic activity of CRISPR/Cas9, including modifications of the Cas9 nuclease, the design of single guide RNA (sgRNA), improvements in delivery methods, and strategies to direct DNA damage towards non-mutagenic repair pathways.

4. **Other Editing Tools**: The paper also introduces several CRISPR/Cas9-based modification tools, such as Cas9 nickase (nCas9), catalytically dead Cas9 (dCas9), and base editors (CBE, ABE, Dual BE) and Prime editors (PE). These tools can induce mutations without causing double-strand breaks.

In summary, by comprehensively analyzing the mutagenic properties and influencing factors of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, the paper aims to provide a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for reducing potential genotoxicity risks during gene editing.